adaminc
adaminc t1_jae3l9d wrote
Reply to comment by Jean_Lucs_Front_Yard in First Image of Ben Mendelsohn, Jovan Adepo & Shailene Woodley in 'TO CATCH A KILLER' - A talented but troubled police officer is recruited by the FBI's chief investigator to help profile and track down a mass murderer | A film by Damián Szifron ('Wild Tales') by mayukhdas1999
I know for a bit she went full environmental activist, I believe she even went to jail for it. In relation to the Dakota Access Pipeline.
adaminc t1_j9z2y7b wrote
Reply to "Shrinking" is making me realize Hollywood fucked up by not putting Harrison Ford in more comedy roles. His dead pan comedic timing is impeccable and hilarious. by Bluest_waters
He was great in the rom-com Six Days, Seven Nights.
adaminc t1_j7wu65i wrote
Reply to comment by ohgoshyes in Researchers find that outdoor cannabis can "express more cannabinoids with potentially desirable bioactivity" compared to cannabis cultivated indoors under artificial lights. by OregonTripleBeam
1361W/m^2 at Earths surface is how bright it is, we can easily simulate and supersede that.
adaminc t1_j2f3n7e wrote
Reply to comment by boissondevin in Do cats and dogs see things under blacklight the same as we do? by Rowsdower32
There doesn't need to be a coating, you can get artificial lenses that don't allow UV light through.
adaminc t1_j2exfz1 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Stretch_3899 in Do cats and dogs see things under blacklight the same as we do? by Rowsdower32
The human retina can actually see UV light, but the lens blocks most of it. If you get cataract surgery, and get an artificial lens implanted, it's possible that you start seeing that UV light, it appears as white though.
It's also dangerous, and you'll need to wear sunglasses outdoors for the rest of your life, during the daytime.
adaminc t1_j0j5qtz wrote
Reply to comment by Argarath in Canon Develops New 19MP Full-Frame Global Shutter Sensor by Avieshek
It looks more like film, where the entire exposing surface is exposed at the same time. Global shutter sensors do the same, versus rolling shutter that does it line by line.
adaminc t1_itg8xdx wrote
I wonder what the pixel pitch is.
adaminc t1_itg8sjl wrote
Reply to comment by cgoot27 in A New 3,200-Megapixel Camera Has Astronomers Salivating by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
It really depends on what is going on in the image, and the exposure settings.
If you are exposing something with relatively low motion, or no motion, these days there really is no difference. But if there is moderate to high motion, than you will see errors start to pop up in the stitched image, especially if the things in motion are moving across stitch edges. If the camera has a built in super-resolution mode where it uses IBIS to shift the sensor, those errors can be even more pronounced and harder to fix in post. Then on top of that, if you need to do longer exposures because the scene is dark, that makes things like motion blurs even harder to deal with because they usually don't look good, or the blur might just suddenly stop, when crossing stitch edges.
So being able to take a single monolithic image will fix most of these issues from the get go.
adaminc t1_jb1m0mj wrote
Reply to comment by intromission76 in Why does Chronic Wasting Disease(CWD) makes deer skinny, even if they eat? by Canisventus
Tongue hanging out, excessive slobbering, being a bit listless while walking similar to someone that is drinking alcohol, looking thinner than they should be. Other than that, you can't tell if it has CWD, and just have to hope it doesn't.
That said, you can chop off the head, and send it in to local facilities that will test it, this is actually encouraged, so the authorities can better map infected populations. In the meantime, you just let the meat sit in your freezer until they report back.