EY is a total clown who inserts enough truth into his (incredibly lengthy) arguments that an air of correctness and solid reasoning permeate from it, but most of his claims simply reduce to p(everyone dies | literally anyone but EY charts the course) ~= 1. I am not exaggerating, he got angry publicly that others had not thought of everything he'd thought of before him when it was so obviously correct.
adventurousprogram4 t1_j9s10z7 wrote
Reply to [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
EY is a total clown who inserts enough truth into his (incredibly lengthy) arguments that an air of correctness and solid reasoning permeate from it, but most of his claims simply reduce to p(everyone dies | literally anyone but EY charts the course) ~= 1. I am not exaggerating, he got angry publicly that others had not thought of everything he'd thought of before him when it was so obviously correct.