But this is exactly the kind of content that gets neglected in academia because of the assumption that everyone reading them already knows the field very well. Lit reviews are wonderful when you can find them, but there's not a lot of incentive to publish those.
If there's a peer-reviewed article out there that covers this info, then by all means please share it! (And in that case, it may be justified to critique someone for sharing the non-peer-reviewed equivalent). But if there's not, it seems pointlessly exclusionary gatekeep the sharing of illuminating content just because it's from outside academia proper.
akrasia_here_I_come t1_j6nmd3k wrote
Reply to comment by PredictorX1 in A taxonomy of generative AI models [R] by EduCGM
But this is exactly the kind of content that gets neglected in academia because of the assumption that everyone reading them already knows the field very well. Lit reviews are wonderful when you can find them, but there's not a lot of incentive to publish those.
If there's a peer-reviewed article out there that covers this info, then by all means please share it! (And in that case, it may be justified to critique someone for sharing the non-peer-reviewed equivalent). But if there's not, it seems pointlessly exclusionary gatekeep the sharing of illuminating content just because it's from outside academia proper.