amanamongbotss
amanamongbotss t1_jdre8r3 wrote
Reply to comment by millenniumpianist in California Snow Depth Visualized (Winter '22-'23) [OC] by plantboy97
While I agree that many don’t see this as a solve, in speaking to my friends that still live in California, 3/6 definitely think that the drought is solved.
Of those 3, 2 are basically totally uninformed about climate change and uninterested in the subject. The other is liberal and understands climate change but is convinced the drought is done and it’s all good from here.
All 3 just keep bringing up how there’s 60ft of snow in the mountains and it’s basically been raining non-stop for 3 months.
I’m probably more pessimistic than they are, but this feels like an extreme weather event (albeit in the other direction from the drought, which was also extreme) and that CA will swing between the two extremes increasingly as time goes on.
But I just wanted to chime in that my anecdotal experience of Californians not being so dumb as to think water issues are over- I think there’s a larger group than you want to admit that truly does.
amanamongbotss t1_j6kl7ya wrote
Reply to comment by paisano1995 in [OC] Joe Burrow's career performance at Arrowhead ("Burrowhead") Stadium by JPAnalyst
Both those things are part of that equation. They’re tracking personnel constantly, with each new snap AND Burrow has 2 elite WRs. He’s making that throw 90% of the time in this situation because he’s on the road in a championship game and you have to.
So you’re wrong about that.
Then to go onto say Burrow didn’t play really well- well, we’ll have to just agree to disagree.
amanamongbotss t1_j6jwxbc wrote
Reply to comment by paisano1995 in [OC] Joe Burrow's career performance at Arrowhead ("Burrowhead") Stadium by JPAnalyst
They were still accurate throws, to great WRs, how have the ability to win contested throws. And they landed.
You don’t think that the “down to 3 rookie corners” and great WRs at the receiving end are baked into the calculation?
Also, one of those WAS a drop. That was not Burrow’s fault. He hit his guy perfectly.
amanamongbotss t1_j6iahpl wrote
Reply to comment by JPAnalyst in [OC] Joe Burrow's career performance at Arrowhead ("Burrowhead") Stadium by JPAnalyst
Yea that happens often. So what?
The stats don’t tell as much of the story as we like to believe.
Watching that game- Burrows played well. Especially for a guy getting avalanched behind the line in probably the least friendly road environment imaginable.
amanamongbotss t1_j6iaafr wrote
Reply to comment by OrphanAdvocate in [OC] Joe Burrow's career performance at Arrowhead ("Burrowhead") Stadium by JPAnalyst
The TD to Higgins was literally a perfect throw and a calculated risk. And it was barely even contested.
That was exactly the type of play you’d hope to see, he gave his guy a chance and put in a spot that played in his favor. Not sure how that reflects poorly for Burrow.
The throw to Chase, who is one of the best WRs in the game, was literally perfect. You can throw into tight windows (sometimes double covered) when you’re that accurate, especially when the guy that was doubled is Jamar Chase.
These aren’t marks against, at all
amanamongbotss t1_j6i6d3u wrote
I love that someone is rubbing it in.
That said, having watched the game last night- Burrow was making some very precise throws and good decisions (generally), and that isn’t reflected in the stats. The TD to Higgins was spot-on and there was also a play where he hit a barely open Chase on the helmet (was incomplete).
One of the INTs was definitely the WRs fault for not holding on while getting hit, too.
Stats, for football, aren’t as great as other sports with more controlled environments (like baseball).
amanamongbotss t1_j6e2pt5 wrote
Reply to comment by Ojisan1 in TIL 'Lucas' was the first movie to introduced the slow clap by SaiFromSd
What the fuck. Charlie Sheen was raping teens?
amanamongbotss t1_izsvbn4 wrote
Reply to comment by dillrepair in [OC] Yearly Average Temperature in the UK, 1884 - 2021 by PieChartPirate
I think the UK gets a lot colder, and then probably a million other things- mass extinction of gulf-stream flora/fauna and such?
amanamongbotss t1_izsv4hc wrote
Reply to comment by SansSanctity in [OC] Yearly Average Temperature in the UK, 1884 - 2021 by PieChartPirate
That seems like a short-sighted rebuttal when the alternative is we all die and we kill nearly everything else and also suffer way more.
amanamongbotss t1_iv142ro wrote
Reply to comment by sandee_eggo in What factors contribute to gas prices? [OC] by USAFacts_Official
Oh this actually is adjusted for inflation.
But yea I believe oil does work it’s way into inflation pretty heavily, especially in public sentiment about it (gas prices are strong correlated with the sitting presidents approval rating- they’re almost identical).
I think inflation is also lower here in the US than many places abroad, and yea- while oil is a big chunk of that we have a lot of other things contributing too. Cost of wheat products for example. And I think the microchip shortage and other supply chain stuff as well…
amanamongbotss t1_iuzsrei wrote
Reply to comment by sandee_eggo in What factors contribute to gas prices? [OC] by USAFacts_Official
I agree this should be adjusted for inflation, but the other thing is a different graph totally
amanamongbotss t1_iux5k6e wrote
It would be interesting to see the profit margins of each of these components, too.
amanamongbotss t1_iu5nt19 wrote
Reply to comment by DavetheHick in Eli5 why was lead added to so many products before it was discovered to be toxic? by thhbeard
So, explain how explain a historical fact about industry knowing lead is toxic and using it anyways is anti-capitalist?
Or, is it true in your mind that saying "nicotine is addictive" is an anti-capitalist statement, too? Or that cigarettes cause cancer? Or that there are documents proving that the oil industry knew about climate change and did nothing?
Is it possible that these things be true, and also the people say them aren't anti-capitalist? Is pointing out a lack of accountability "anti" at all?
amanamongbotss t1_iu5ajf2 wrote
Reply to comment by DavetheHick in Eli5 why was lead added to so many products before it was discovered to be toxic? by thhbeard
Lol the anti-lead agenda?
You missed that boat like decades ago man. Hahaha. Where do you people come from??
amanamongbotss t1_iu4fcvx wrote
Reply to [OC] Worship vs Fertility by dbabbitt
What is the point of this?
amanamongbotss t1_iu4f95p wrote
Reply to comment by PreyInstinct in [OC] Worship vs Fertility by dbabbitt
And contraceptives/protection
amanamongbotss t1_iu4f80b wrote
Reply to comment by Kragkin in [OC] Worship vs Fertility by dbabbitt
Please tell me this is sarcastic?
amanamongbotss t1_iu2iozx wrote
Reply to comment by ResponsibilityOne224 in U.S. GDP accelerated at 2.6% pace in Q3, better than expected as growth turns positive by DaniChicago
Ah, thanks so much!
amanamongbotss t1_isd94u7 wrote
Reply to comment by NemosGhost in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
Lol “Lincoln lovers?” He is considered the best US President. Most of America loves him. He preserved the union.
You must be a salty southerner
amanamongbotss t1_iscujgv wrote
Reply to comment by ChipsAloy80 in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
I don’t know what any of that means
amanamongbotss t1_isco1fn wrote
Reply to comment by NemosGhost in TIL: During the US Civil War, a father issued a writ of habeus corpus to get his underaged Son out of the US Army, when the writ was delivered to the camp, the provost had both the lawyer who had delivered the writ, and the Judge who had issued the writ arrested and imprisoned. by hoosyourdaddyo
One of the rare examples of the benevolent dictator. /s
He wasn’t a tyrant- he was elected democratically, and while “ignoring the Supreme Court” seems bad, considering our current SCROTUS, I think there are obviously times where ignoring them is probably better for the country. More often than not, even, as they’re usually behind the times (dred Scott?).
Out of curiosity was it the same Supreme Court that issued the dred Scott ruling? Cause yea- I’d have them arrested too.
Edit: yes, this was the Supreme Court Chief Justice that wrote that people of African descent weren’t citizens of the US and therefore claim none of the rights and privileges of Americans.
Taney, the Chief Justice, was a racist POS that stood in the way of progress. I understand that it is philosophically dangerous to argue a president should arrest or ignore another branch of government, for obvious reasons, but- I’m making an exception here with the benefit of hindsight. Fuck that SCOTUS.
amanamongbotss t1_jdrhd68 wrote
Reply to comment by Porsche928dude in California Snow Depth Visualized (Winter '22-'23) [OC] by plantboy97
I hope so! I mean I’m definitely not rooting for the demise of CA, I like seeing them thrive economically and politically (even when it’s not all perfect).
My main concern is exactly that- I get have to basically be able to hold onto water for up to decades and it feels like no one in America, let alone California, is turning the boat fast enough to adjust our practices in the light of climate change.
My fear is all this freshwater just runs into the ocean and they’re in a severe drought again in 2-3 years, and this cycle keeps repeating…