Remember how these weirdos pushed trans fat over saturated fat because it's better for the earth and doesn't rely on animals?.... Only to come out years later that eating trans fats are absolutely terrible for your health. These are the same nutcases that want us to eat grinded bugs and eat fake meats made out of soy.
False. The nutrition density of meat is being blissfully ignored. The amount of calories and nutrients in meat isn't easily substituted by a single plant source. In order to substitute you would have to grow a hell-of-a-lot of different types of plants. This would increase the demand for fertilizer. You can't just grow plants without fertilizer.
atrophy1999 t1_jaa6d73 wrote
Reply to This “Climate-Friendly” Fuel Comes With an Astronomical Cancer Risk: Almost half of products cleared so far under the new federal biofuels program are not in fact biofuels — and the EPA acknowledges that the plastic-based ones may present an “unreasonable risk” to human health or the environment. by nastratin
Remember how these weirdos pushed trans fat over saturated fat because it's better for the earth and doesn't rely on animals?.... Only to come out years later that eating trans fats are absolutely terrible for your health. These are the same nutcases that want us to eat grinded bugs and eat fake meats made out of soy.