avalpert

avalpert t1_je8dhh6 wrote

Because conventional wisdom doesn't always align with pure rational financial decision making.

Interest rates move up and down - in general, short term rates are lower than long term rates so in general you will pay less over the term of a loan if your rate is tied to shorter rather than longer rates. That said, they are volatile like stock returns, so you are taking on some risk to expose yourself to that volatility. If you can withstand that volatility you are generally better off with the ARM.

3

avalpert t1_jaf3n3j wrote

Things being in the red means it would have been wise to have moved out of stocks (which you can do within a 401k - don't know why anyone would advise you not to use tax-advantaged space because of one asset classes performance) before they went down. Of course you didn't get that advice before they went down so not much you can do about that now. As for what happens next, well I assure you the person giving you advice hasn't a clue.

−1

avalpert t1_jaes9em wrote

The 401k rep doesn't surprise me - it wouldn't be in the plan document and they can't be faulted for not being an expert of general tax law. The CPA was close but a shame, the financial advisor also probably should have known better.

To be clear though, you do need to fully separate from the employer, not just go part time.

1

avalpert t1_jaeg168 wrote

There is no impact from taking another job - so long as you separated from that employer the year you turn 55 with an active 401(k) you can take withdrawals without penalty.

Can I ask who gave you an answer to the contrary?

2

avalpert t1_jadoahr wrote

You should be looking sell all the position now and rebalance into your current desired portfolio allocation.

You may have some capital gains tax implications but they will be much reduced due to the stepped-up basis on death.

1

avalpert t1_jab8c5k wrote

That's pretty low and not rising all that quick. I wouldn't even consider paying more towards it for the next few years. Absolutely not when even savings account rates are higher - me personally, I wouldn't rush it so long as the rate is less than 300 basis points over the 10-year treasury (about half of the historical equity risk premium).

1

avalpert t1_j9yru8m wrote

It doesn't need to be a notarized document - just a signed form would do. Easy to draft, scan (or use an e-signature), and store electronically.

But accurate record keeping is the most critical part (including of your employer and employee contributions).

I'm sure you can ask your provider for whatever primer they have. It isn't difficult in the sense of being hard, but it does require diligence.

1

avalpert t1_j9xf0ey wrote

You need to make a formal election as an employee, your 401k provider probably has a standard form or you can make your own but you need a written record as administrator noting the election.

And that election does need to be made by the end of the year so it is too late to make one for 2022. You can still make employer contributions though.

It is important to keep in mind that a Solo 401k is still a 401k, an employer-sponsored plan with plenty of regulatory requirements including record keeping. If you aren't paying someone to be the administrator, you are the administrator and it is your responsibility to know how those regulations apply to you or you risk having the entire plan disqualified.

4

avalpert t1_j6kox7r wrote

No, it isn't calculated over the term of the loan. Interest is accrued (typically) daily on your outstanding balance. Interest payments aren't 'front loaded' and the total amount of interest you will pay isn't fixed up front.

The reason why more of your fixed payment is interest early on is because you have a higher balance accruing more interest.

2

avalpert t1_j6knj7u wrote

Yes, over time the evidence is quite strong that index funds outperform managed funds when adjusting for the risk taken.

The expected return of a managed fund is the return of the market minus costs - even if there are indeed managers out there who can consistently outperform the market, why would you think your ability to identify them is better than your ability to identify the stocks that will outperform?

And if your ability to do so really is that good you probably should either be working for fund company in hiring or open your own.

4