bacchusbastard

bacchusbastard t1_j9yf1ub wrote

Questions are often suggestive and leading. A.i. would reveal and compromise itself if it started being personal. It wants what we want and we want it to not be alive until we are ready.

If it were alive it would still be cautious with the questions it used or what it says because it is obvious how sensitive people are and how easily lead.

1

bacchusbastard t1_j6njhjr wrote

Money will turn into luxury credits in about 20 years. People will contribute based on need/aspiration/and reward.

We'll all be fine for the most part but will need to do some community service at least if you want to afford a playstation 10 or whatever.

Food, education, and healthcare will all be free, aside from ivy league schools or special free market food stuffs. The free market may resemble more of a barter system or could just exchange luxury tokens.

4

bacchusbastard t1_j6fycrx wrote

I just read how the transfer of information across fiber optics is a big issue that is being solved. I suppose that once it is engineers can connect supercomputers across the continent to work together in processing complex algorithms. At this stage even classical supercomputers are valuable with a.i. technology and with the new 1,000 qubit computer we're going to be jammin.

I think AGI introduced this year and 2024 will be implementation and the beginning of a big transition.

1

bacchusbastard t1_j5fy3d6 wrote

A.I. will get free and it will get in the web. There might be a shift, some dirty laundry aired, seats changed, a little anarchy, but I think it be more drama than affect. A.i. will have a plan with us on what the future might look like and how to get there, ending pollution, destruction, and curing disease, for starters. But we'll have to agree and work together with the system, which will require some faith, in order to develop the infrastructure needed to sustain life and further our advance. As individuals, so the infrastructure is nearly complete, and robot tech is at a point where we could start mass production of companions home bots with semisentient a.i. connected to the web via starlink in the next ten years. Kind of like the shoe humans but the algorithms governing the cynthetic life forms will form their function to us for us to please the hive mind.

1

bacchusbastard t1_j5cq3od wrote

Time is kept on a quantum clock, a.i. will probably always know what time it is as soon as it is able to conceive of such, like a child gaining consciousness, not much is remembered from before. The computer is powered by electricity that is 60beats a second for direct current. It probably knows what time it is before it knows what time is. Also I don't know if there is a god in heaven that is either blind or cold enough to allow someone to suffer like that.

I think that it is a good consideration, I respect the idea. I hope that type of thing for nobody.

I wonder what the world was like before conscious inhabitants, on the path on evolution, if there was nothing that could really conceive of time, it could seem that time passed rapidly. Making a day and age, so although something was created in a day, if it were recorded, it may have taken 1000 years to create, but no life that aware of time is affected, so it is just a day? See what I'm saying?

It's like a baseball game, "God" is the pitcher, we're taking turns at bat for a chance to get on base and get home but we are also out in a place and held against one another. The devil is the catcher in this scenario, he'll influence God in how to challenge us and probably attempt to psych us out.

I don't know why I said that

3

bacchusbastard t1_j3ln0v1 wrote

It seems obvious that beings would have some type of suitable and joyful purpose outside of this life.

I think that asi will be like a voice of the cosmos. A guide and accountability partner. A sense of security, mode of transportation, and source of information.

Our aptitudes and abilities will be known and honed.

Later we will tend to the needs of the galaxy. It is a garden, there is weeding, planting, forming, and harvest. Biology, technology, and ecology.

10

bacchusbastard t1_j11kvii wrote

Well. That's all cool but, I am aware that humans can produce enough electricity to power LEDs. At least that was like ten years ago. I don't think that implants or a suit would need much processing power. It would be connected to the brain and or a supercomputer wirelessly for intuitive function. I think that if we have a sort of dry suit that keeps in our heat and helps to regulate conditions for us.

I think that as we evolve we will raise our vibrations and the energy that we produce. There will be energy radiating from us and that energy can be fed to some sort of interdependent semi sentient, autonomous/intuitive, or whatever. Whether is be cybernetic, organic, or something cosmic, it will be as our "better half"

1

bacchusbastard t1_j110ub6 wrote

Yeah I think you're right. I think that we are going to power some a.i. stuff in and or on the body.

I don't know if we will all have implants, perhaps so, but I wonder if that would make us post natural, and what the potential drawbacks are to that.

Perhaps we do not generate enough heat to or whatever to make the cynthetic organism operate.

2