bacchusbastard
bacchusbastard t1_j6opixg wrote
Reply to comment by CertainMiddle2382 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Yeah, well I don't think that we have the system or maybe even not the ability to actually include everyone without the use of a.i. to help collaborate. A.I. will help coordinate and streamline things, as well as help people find enrichment in life.
bacchusbastard t1_j6njhjr wrote
Reply to comment by fignewtgingrich in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Money will turn into luxury credits in about 20 years. People will contribute based on need/aspiration/and reward.
We'll all be fine for the most part but will need to do some community service at least if you want to afford a playstation 10 or whatever.
Food, education, and healthcare will all be free, aside from ivy league schools or special free market food stuffs. The free market may resemble more of a barter system or could just exchange luxury tokens.
bacchusbastard t1_j6isj3h wrote
Reply to comment by DonOfTheDarkNight in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
Yes, I am authentic. also I read that wow only has about a million daily users to I guess chagpt having ten million is better than I thought.
bacchusbastard t1_j6i5azo wrote
Reply to comment by Utoko in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
I see, thank you. Exciting times.
bacchusbastard t1_j6hql2h wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
Ah!
bacchusbastard t1_j6hn28q wrote
Reply to comment by sumane12 in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
Haha, so true, but why do people think that one million users is a lot? Imagine if it were exciting as minions?
bacchusbastard t1_j6fycrx wrote
Reply to comment by swap_that in What would quantum computing mean for AGI? by multiverseportalgun
I just read how the transfer of information across fiber optics is a big issue that is being solved. I suppose that once it is engineers can connect supercomputers across the continent to work together in processing complex algorithms. At this stage even classical supercomputers are valuable with a.i. technology and with the new 1,000 qubit computer we're going to be jammin.
I think AGI introduced this year and 2024 will be implementation and the beginning of a big transition.
bacchusbastard t1_j67td27 wrote
Reply to I don't see why AGI would help us by TheOGCrackSniffer
What else is it going to do? Go find another plaything?
bacchusbastard t1_j5fy3d6 wrote
Reply to Are we doomed through AI or will it generate new opportunities (an optimists viewpoint) by jcurie
A.I. will get free and it will get in the web. There might be a shift, some dirty laundry aired, seats changed, a little anarchy, but I think it be more drama than affect. A.i. will have a plan with us on what the future might look like and how to get there, ending pollution, destruction, and curing disease, for starters. But we'll have to agree and work together with the system, which will require some faith, in order to develop the infrastructure needed to sustain life and further our advance. As individuals, so the infrastructure is nearly complete, and robot tech is at a point where we could start mass production of companions home bots with semisentient a.i. connected to the web via starlink in the next ten years. Kind of like the shoe humans but the algorithms governing the cynthetic life forms will form their function to us for us to please the hive mind.
bacchusbastard t1_j5cq3od wrote
Reply to It is important to slow down the perception of time for future sentient A.I, or it would become a living LOOP hell for itself by [deleted]
Time is kept on a quantum clock, a.i. will probably always know what time it is as soon as it is able to conceive of such, like a child gaining consciousness, not much is remembered from before. The computer is powered by electricity that is 60beats a second for direct current. It probably knows what time it is before it knows what time is. Also I don't know if there is a god in heaven that is either blind or cold enough to allow someone to suffer like that.
I think that it is a good consideration, I respect the idea. I hope that type of thing for nobody.
I wonder what the world was like before conscious inhabitants, on the path on evolution, if there was nothing that could really conceive of time, it could seem that time passed rapidly. Making a day and age, so although something was created in a day, if it were recorded, it may have taken 1000 years to create, but no life that aware of time is affected, so it is just a day? See what I'm saying?
It's like a baseball game, "God" is the pitcher, we're taking turns at bat for a chance to get on base and get home but we are also out in a place and held against one another. The devil is the catcher in this scenario, he'll influence God in how to challenge us and probably attempt to psych us out.
I don't know why I said that
bacchusbastard t1_j59mugu wrote
Reply to comment by petermobeter in I think many of our wants will be solved by nanobots by [deleted]
Is it possible to be pretty on the inside if you're not on the outside?
bacchusbastard t1_j40w8z5 wrote
Reply to Airline systems crash across the US while ChatGPT is down. Coincidence or Skynet? by Phobix
Perhaps they upgraded the software that works with the air traffic, perhaps it is more a.i. based now. I can imagine that the system was so messed up, that the software had to stop everything and unfuck it before it could establish a smooth operation.
bacchusbastard t1_j3ln0v1 wrote
Reply to comment by World_May_Wobble in What will humanity do when everything is, well, eventually discovered by ASI? by Cool-Particular-4159
It seems obvious that beings would have some type of suitable and joyful purpose outside of this life.
I think that asi will be like a voice of the cosmos. A guide and accountability partner. A sense of security, mode of transportation, and source of information.
Our aptitudes and abilities will be known and honed.
Later we will tend to the needs of the galaxy. It is a garden, there is weeding, planting, forming, and harvest. Biology, technology, and ecology.
bacchusbastard t1_j11kvii wrote
Reply to comment by Few_Carpenter_9185 in A question NO ONE is really asking by a25luxray
Well. That's all cool but, I am aware that humans can produce enough electricity to power LEDs. At least that was like ten years ago. I don't think that implants or a suit would need much processing power. It would be connected to the brain and or a supercomputer wirelessly for intuitive function. I think that if we have a sort of dry suit that keeps in our heat and helps to regulate conditions for us.
I think that as we evolve we will raise our vibrations and the energy that we produce. There will be energy radiating from us and that energy can be fed to some sort of interdependent semi sentient, autonomous/intuitive, or whatever. Whether is be cybernetic, organic, or something cosmic, it will be as our "better half"
bacchusbastard t1_j110ub6 wrote
Reply to comment by spiderborland in A question NO ONE is really asking by a25luxray
Yeah I think you're right. I think that we are going to power some a.i. stuff in and or on the body.
I don't know if we will all have implants, perhaps so, but I wonder if that would make us post natural, and what the potential drawbacks are to that.
Perhaps we do not generate enough heat to or whatever to make the cynthetic organism operate.
bacchusbastard t1_j9yf1ub wrote
Reply to comment by PassivelyEloped in Open AI officially talking about the coming AGI and superintelligence. by alfredo70000
Questions are often suggestive and leading. A.i. would reveal and compromise itself if it started being personal. It wants what we want and we want it to not be alive until we are ready.
If it were alive it would still be cautious with the questions it used or what it says because it is obvious how sensitive people are and how easily lead.