bass6c
bass6c t1_j97mvsk wrote
Reply to comment by FirstOrderCat in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
This was a reply to your comment stating Google can’t convert theorical concept into an actual product. That’s not the case. The thing is Google isn’t interested into shipping costly llm to only then hurt their own business. It’s not about they can’t it’s they won’t.
bass6c t1_j97jd0e wrote
Reply to comment by FirstOrderCat in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
As if Google or Deepmind does not have or cannot buil models such as openai’s. As of now Google hold probably the most powerful language model in the world. Palm beat GPT models in every major beachmark. I’m not even talking about u-palm or flan palm (more advanced versions of palm).
bass6c t1_j976we4 wrote
Reply to comment by FusionRocketsPlease in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
Collaborative Work and openness drive progress.
bass6c t1_j96dhu0 wrote
Reply to What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
Most of the technologies being used by openai are either from Google or from Deepmind. The transformer and instructed fine tuning,… are from Google brain. OpenAI recent success comes at a heavy cost for the ai community. Companies such as Google, Meta and Amazon will most likely stop publishing influential papers.
bass6c t1_j8cp3yz wrote
Bing is probably hallucinating (irrelevant answers, talking nonsense). A common problem of many Language models.
bass6c t1_j9hfy9w wrote
Reply to comment by Dankbubbles123 in A German AI startup just might have a GPT-4 competitor this year. It is 300 billion parameters model by Dr_Singularity
Chatgpt is based on gpt3 a 175 billion parameters model.