As many times as you keep replying with utterly useless shit, plus 1

Yeah i bet you’re about to enlighten me though instead of posting useless shit to make yourself feel better lol

Oh fuck off they can buy out his contract and fire him if they want

But go ahead and be butthurt cuz you have no clue what due process is

I would support that concept for victimless crimes like drug use/possession, etc. just not when the the abuser has any position of authority/power to continue their abuse

My apologies if I misunderstood your position then

I mean if we want to act like we don’t know anything about domestic abuse and this is a brand new, never before seen concept that we have to grapple with for the first time.. your point is perfectly reasonable

But thats not the case now is it? Shit doesn’t happen in a vacuum and if you want to say the incredibly low percentage of false accusations somehow gives you pause in evaluating this, I can say the opposite using the exact same stat. Its up to you which side you want to fall on is all

So what you’re concerned with then is workers rights because the latitude given to employers in at-will (i think i said right to work previously) states is a little unfair

Hey Im concerned with that too, but i don’t use domestic abuse cases as the poster child for my cause and then defend said accused abuser

I mean my comment was just responding to the actual definition of due process and y’all didn’t like that either so i doubt anything you say is in good faith

If thats what gets your jimmy’s rustled and not the domestic abuse idk what else to tell you

I mean obviously due process only refers to your legal rights, employers in at-will states can do what they want mostly

Also, we have things like pre-trial holding in the legal system so even then its not some catch-all one simple trick

Edit: pre-trial holding not pre-charge