binghamtonswag

binghamtonswag t1_j6okhxv wrote

I provided several solutions to the problems you posited. You are the one who comes off extremely inflexible and unwilling to consider other viewpoints in this discussion. I didn’t even downvote you, are you aware there’s more than 1 other user on Reddit? I get that being downvoted can sometimes feel unpleasant and put you on the defensive but these last two posts of yours are just a really bad look, not going to sugar coat it.

2

binghamtonswag t1_j6o7lv9 wrote

I mean it seems extreme but so is the death of an infant. Yes, management absolutely needed to make arrangements so their vulnerable patients were cared for in the event of a known strike date. Maybe they could have kept a small amount of the maternity ward with their limited staff. This isn't a reach, this is managements responsibilities. Tough place to be but that was it.

12

binghamtonswag t1_j6o3mfi wrote

Then it was on management in the weeks leading up to the strike to ensure their most vulnerable patients were sent to properly staffed facilities and not accept additional ones. The disruption to normal flow of operations should have been Mount Sinai caring for fewer patients and receiving less in fees, not having patients die.

24

binghamtonswag t1_j199h08 wrote

They got so mad they read through my account and found I like Pokémon 😂😂 Then they thought it was some sort of dunk to point out I like the most popular media franchise of all time. I can’t imagine the sort of insecurities that led to that decision but here we are. What you believe about my knowledge of the rules of professional conduct or really anything is quite frankly not very relevant because you’ve shown yourself in this conversation to be one of the dumbest people on the internet and that’s saying something.

1

binghamtonswag t1_j18s1nn wrote

>Isn’t it common sense that, as a lawyer, you don’t patronize businesses that you’re firm is litigating against though?

No this is absurd. MSG is a far reaching corporation across New York with lots of exposure. This is going to result in lot of legitimate lawsuits. Any owner who wasn't the petulant slob that Dolan has shown himself to be would take these lawsuits as nbd cost of doing business. It's just that there's a jaded former drunk running the Knicks with the emotional maturity of a child.

10