brian_sahn

brian_sahn t1_ixy74u9 wrote

So your opinion on the matter isn’t confirmed by these studies so it must be the studies that are wrong, not your opinion? Is that what you’re saying? Can you specifically identify any part of the methodology that is flawed?

1

brian_sahn t1_ixwpt0h wrote

You’re making it political by assuming it is biased because the article is hosted on a website that ends in .gov. Let me know if you have any comments on the substance of the research, not what website it is hosted on.

And here, is this better?

3

brian_sahn t1_ixufyl7 wrote

This sub is about science, not politics. That said, here’s your study. It took me all of 3 seconds to find that using google. If you want people to listen to you and take you seriously, it helps to actually know what you’re talking about.

23

brian_sahn t1_iw78xd0 wrote

I think it’s intended to prove ownership so you have a version that predates the copied/stolen version. I can’t say if it would hold up in court though.

4