I just pocket such money and stop thinking about it

Ohh, so it MUST be true then.

Armored ambulance is a military asset.

This is not a "weak spot."

This is just blatant and vicious propoganda

If you cannot trust them on one topic, why would you trust them on others?

You never know when their open bias is going to bleed over.

Al Jazeera is so awfull on middle east I stopped trusting them entirely.

Because if they lack journalistic integrity on some issues, you never know when it will bleed over.

I just ignore Al Jazeer as a source.

Particularly anything that has to do with Israel and Middle East. They are incapable of honest reporting on such issues.

Firesale!!

All Iran Intel must go!

Oh no!

A dangerous precedent!

I am shaking!

A real dangerous precedent is allowing Russia to conduct a hybrid war in a middle of your country. A hybrid war that can become hot at any second as Ukraine unambiguously proved.

But some people never seem to learn...

Change the constitution?

Come on Moldova, don't. Be pursues.

Ask Ukraine for help kicking out Russia from Transnistria.

Would it really be so hard to say "Russia officials claim that civilian pull-out is ending in anticipation of Kherson battle."

>Why do you think Ukraine call them forced deportions

Ohh, so it may be a deportation not an evacuation?

So now you agree that the article simply uncritically repeated Russian propaganda in the headline?

cool cool.

>There is no reason for Russia to say they've stopped

Russia LIES. All the time. Russia employs "firehose of falsehood" techniques constantly. "There is no reason for Russia to lie" is a position of naivete indicating that someone learned nothing over last 8 months.

I have zero reason to think that forced deportations stopped just because Russia says so.

>nd everybody expects there to be some kind of battle for Kherson

How do you know know that? It's not a fact. E.g. Russia can always chose to withdraw as they did in many other areas.

Presenting the battle as a fact is irresponsible.

Headline is trash here and you know it.

> It starts.. "Russian officials say"

No.

It starts WITH THE HEADLINE.

Yes, article is written better that the headline. However, the HEADLINE is un-factual, uncritical repetition of Russian propaganda.

Unacceptable.

>They're reporting the facts

It's not a "fact" that there ever was a civilian pull-out.

It's not a "fact" that it was "ended."

It's not a fact that there will be a "Kherson battle."

So there are three non-facts in the headline alone.

So this is not "reporting facts." This is repeating propaganda.

BBC, please stop uncritically repeating Russian propaganda.