Great Barrington voter here. I’m all for regulating dental insurers, but the 83% figure seems arbitrary, not based on data, insurers will have numerous ways to meet the 83% threshold, and there’s no guarantee that this will in any way lower costs or improve overall dental health.
dangott04 t1_ivpz42a wrote
Reply to Why did Great Barrington vote so staunchly for No on 2? by nrvs_hbt
Great Barrington voter here. I’m all for regulating dental insurers, but the 83% figure seems arbitrary, not based on data, insurers will have numerous ways to meet the 83% threshold, and there’s no guarantee that this will in any way lower costs or improve overall dental health.