dantemanjones

dantemanjones t1_je3gbbp wrote

Urkel wasn't in the first 3 episodes of Family Matters and missed 3 of the next 6.

Topanga missed the first 3 episodes of Boy Meets World and 6 of the first 7. She wasn't supposed to be a regular and the actress who was originally cast was replaced shortly before it was shot.

The Janitor from Scrubs, Castiel in Supernatural, Gunther from Friends, Andy from The Office, and Andy from Parks & Rec are other examples. Maybe they won't be back immediately but there are lots of examples of guest cast becoming supporting or regular cast.

1

dantemanjones t1_jdzqxnj wrote

Jerry Stiller in the Seinfeld episode when it flashes back to his time in the army. Not child exactly but 18-20ish character played by a 69 year old dude.

Dexter and his amazing wigs played by Michael C. Hall.

Caity Lotz played young Sarah in an episode of Legends of Tomorrow. All of the other characters with younger selves were played by different actors.

3

dantemanjones t1_jcxtf9w wrote

The biggest differences are budget and number of episodes. TWD really had to cut corners, especially after season 1, and they were hampered in the number of locations they could use and what they could do. Also, TWD ran for a long time and had a few creative valleys in there. I rank the best few peaks of TWD way above TLOU, but the low points of TWD probably are making you forget how great it could be.

8

dantemanjones t1_jacrkn4 wrote

Back when Stargate SG-1 was airing, I would wait for the DVDs and binge it. That was more because I didn't want to miss a couple of episodes than because I wanted to binge it.

Other than that? Not really. I tend to binge most stuff I'm watching because I hop from streamer to streamer, so there's usually a good chunk of content available all at once.

3

dantemanjones t1_j246d96 wrote

I'm a few episodes behind. Before SNW, it was the best ST show since the 90s (I like Lower Decks too, but it's less in the tone of what I'm looking for with ST). What I've seen so far has been pretty good and I'll continue watching it with Season 2 when it comes out. I'm well outside of the target demo for it, but I think it has a wide appeal.

2

dantemanjones t1_j1zrw6o wrote

Season 1 yes. Season 2 is totally different than 1. A lot of the characters are different, the tone, the story, etc, all wildly diverge from S1. Season 1 reveals the mysteries that it leads to and the story changes from there. If that change is a big dropoff in excitement for you, then Season 2 is probably not going to be as good. Season 1 had a final cliffhanger scene but otherwise wrapped up well.

I don't remember S2 as well but I think that wrapped up well too. The cancellation isn't a reason to avoid it.

3

dantemanjones t1_j1nykwl wrote

An episode that you could remove without noticing. There is no impact to the overall plot. No characters are changed in any way. It's never referenced again.

Many shows like sitcoms and procedurals are designed this way. Filler is not inherently good or bad. Often when it's an adaptation of something, I find the filler to be bad. But in some shows, filler is the best stuff. I couldn't care less about the overarching X-Files plot, but the episodic episodes ruled.

3

dantemanjones t1_iy3mc34 wrote

I felt the same way as you. I powered through it because it had been so heavily recommended by people I trusted. It stays the same through episode 8, then episode 9 is exciting. I did not think it was worth the journey and don't plan on watching more. If episodes 1-8 were condensed into 2 episodes and episode 9 was the third episode, it would have been fantastic.

−2

dantemanjones t1_ixuk8e9 wrote

Hulu is profitable, Disney+ isn't.

Fox had distribution rights to the first 6 Star Wars films, now Disney does.

X-Men, Fantastic Four, Deadpool, Avatar, The Simpsons, Ice Age, Aliens, and FX are now Disney properties. There's a whole host of library content that can increase the value of Hulu or Disney+ too.

2