dnaH_notnA
dnaH_notnA t1_j93co8v wrote
Reply to 1st UK child to receive gene therapy for fatal genetic disorder is now 'happy and healthy' by lordatlas
Cool. Now when do we get plasmids?
dnaH_notnA t1_j8jhunu wrote
Reply to comment by UncleVoodooo in The US government says women’s underwear should cost more than men’s by TheTim
One of the only commodities to gain value through use /s
dnaH_notnA t1_j8ihb6q wrote
Using the term “degeneracy” unironically. Neoludditism is getting a hell of a boost from these guys.
If people aren’t causing interpersonal, societal, or economic issues, and they can afford to do it, what ground do you have to bar them from it?
dnaH_notnA t1_j6tlmy2 wrote
Reply to comment by ph16053 in An AI robot lawyer was set to argue in court. Real lawyers shut it down. : NPR by persianphilosopher
If the data is hand selected by fallible human beings with a bias? Yes.
dnaH_notnA t1_ivs84c2 wrote
Reply to comment by ttkciar in 3D-printed weapons: Interpol and defense experts warn of ‘serious’ evolving threat by mossadnik
You trust governments not to outright kill people who do downright subversive shit? Have you never heard of the FBI or the CIA in your entire life? Do you think European countries are any less like that?
dnaH_notnA t1_ivs7wp9 wrote
Reply to comment by modelvillager in 3D-printed weapons: Interpol and defense experts warn of ‘serious’ evolving threat by mossadnik
This terms me you know nothing about CAD, 3d printing, or firearms.
The 3d printed part is not usually the pressure holding part, and is not distinguishable from, say, a custom nerf gun part or a whole host of other things you can’t even think up as an individual. There would either be so many false positives in a hypothetical AI gun detector that the software would be unusable, or it would do nothing.
dnaH_notnA t1_j9ikd2f wrote
Reply to my-AM-ee by michaelkah
If I didn’t know any better, I’d say that’s a nice Bi-gender Pride flag wallpaper lol.