> Someone asked how ai can be used to help with exploitation. So I asked ai.

Which is pointless, as it's not answering your question, it's generating text which approximates the way an answer would look.

edit: LMAO op blocked me for calling him out! wow!

> Now you say I’m claiming it can’t be used for fighting exploitation? When did I say that.

No, I'm saying why did you bother posting a chatGPT response about that, when it is just generating text that approximates real text, but isn't actually true? Either you believe your argument about "ai can be good", and you are legitimately trying to use the BS text it generated to convince people, or you don't believe it, and you're comment is pointless and misleading for no reason (since it's BS text).

And what does Google working with the FBI to combat sex trafficking have to do with AI? That's not an AI-based initiative.

Ok? Are you trying to claim you actually don't believe AI has positive uses in fighting sexual exploitation, and you were just conducting a social experiment?

You do realize that chatGPT just makes up bullshit, right? It's a language generation mechanism, it's not even able to access external information sources like Google searches.

That is like saying everyone has access to computers; sure, but only the powerful have supercomputers, satellites, datacenters, and police who can kick open your door and take your laptop.

You just have your laptop.