economy_programmer_

economy_programmer_ t1_j098oz2 wrote

I strongly disagree.
First of all, you should define the "philosophical sense of fly", and second of all, try to imagine a perfect robotic replica of the anatomy of a bird, why that should not be considered fly? And if it is considered flying, what's the line that divides an airplane, a robotic bird replica and a real bird? I think you are reducing a philosophical problem to a mechanical problem.

−2