# eegocentrik

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_jarbfau wrote

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j9y7a3e wrote

Reply to comment by **cooldude87** in **Our stomach is always trying to kill us, Eating resets the timer..** by **feuud**

Also hunger is a hormone and its not produced by the stomach.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j9mcydn wrote

Reply to **The ease with which you can clean blood off skin with just water shows how frequently our ancestors must have gotten blood on them.** by **[deleted]**

The ease with which you can clean shit off your asshole with just paper shows how frequently our ancestors must have bought Charmin.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6hq5jg wrote

Only when my Jimmy reservoir is full.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6hpizc wrote

Reply to comment by **Jumbled_Apartment_** in **Peanuts are beans and not nuts because they're legumes.** by **[deleted]**

I am in agreement! This completely changes my life! This dreaded nut allergy has haunted me for decades. To know now, that peanuts are no longer nuts but legumes opens up so many new eating adventures!

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6baanc wrote

Reply to comment by **great_auks** in **The Tooth Fairy injects mass amounts of newly-created money into the economy and therefore directly causes inflation.** by **I_Seen_Some_Stuff**

Balances out as Santa injects free consumer goods.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6b55zx wrote

Reply to comment by **Buck_Thorn** in **The number of people older than you never increases** by **Bubbles_The_Mushroom**

I beleive I'm the only one thinking on this, you are just lazily accepting the unpractical notion.

People are of many different densities.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6b0o50 wrote

Reply to comment by **Buck_Thorn** in **The number of people older than you never increases** by **Bubbles_The_Mushroom**

Yes. Yes you do.

Yes you need to know or you can't prove it.

Please provide evidence for your claim?

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6ahj4v wrote

Reply to comment by **Buck_Thorn** in **The number of people older than you never increases** by **Bubbles_The_Mushroom**

I think you are.

You have to know the number to verify, you can't go through life assuming based on Fuzzy-Wuzzy non-practical applications.

The number represents a data point and that data point cannot be verified to be 100% accurate.

If the number is not 100% accurate then a reconciliation could cause the number to increase, thus proving your claim incorrect.

I think you are having a hard time grasping the fact that when applied, your observation falls short. It's okay to be wrong, you just need to revise.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j6a5pti wrote

**Buck_Thorn** in **The number of people older than you never increases** by **Bubbles_The_Mushroom**

What method would you use to calculate the number of people older than you?

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j698eo6 wrote

The "correct" number of people older than you never increases.

The problem becomes what is the correct number? I would argue it can never be known as the null hypothesis is unfalsifiable with current methods.

Census data would be the source for this data and needs to be corrected all of the time.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j68qn3y wrote

Reply to **We all come from a very long line of people who successfully managed to procreate** by **[deleted]**

Not saying much.....

I'm more impressed when people successfully decide not to procreate.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j5z14ay wrote

Reply to **Historical mathematicians must have been quite impractical by nature since they discovered complex numbers before calculus.** by **Shamon_Yu**

....or maybe they discovered complex numbers then invented calculus to help explain them?

Newton developed his fluxional calculus in an attempt to evade the informal use of infinitesimals in his calculations.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j290ffx wrote

Reply to comment by **M8dude** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Look up the definition of mathematical fraction.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28zu8k wrote

Reply to comment by **symmetra__main** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

No evidence for gods either.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28ytru wrote

Reply to comment by **symmetra__main** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

I didn't say that.

I said there are no numbers between 0 and 1, only quotients (Elements)

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28xw3p wrote

Reply to comment by **xSteee** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Yes, irrational numbers do not apply here.

This is not a math issue, this is a semantic issue.

Fractions are quotients of rational numbers.

1 is the smallest unit of count.

Half of 1 can be represented by the quotients 1/2 or .5

Half of one can also be expressed as 2 new things that are not 1.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28x6o7 wrote

Reply to comment by **M8dude** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Nope.

The numbers from 0 to 1 are elements of 1, quotients, not numbers.

Does this contradictory statement make more sense to you?

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28wc0a wrote

Reply to comment by **xSteee** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

It's not a new number. It's a fractional representation of the numerator and does not exist outside of it.

There are not infinite NUMBERS between 0 and 1 only elements.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28vo6x wrote

Reply to comment by **xSteee** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Quotients.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28vlur wrote

Reply to comment by **imregrettingthis** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

I appreciate your support in this cause.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28utwg wrote

Reply to comment by **M8dude** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

From 0 to 1.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28urvo wrote

Reply to comment by **imregrettingthis** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Your Google search didn't work.

Your evidence failed.

Thank you for finally agreeing with me.

Sometimes you just need to check it out for yourself and learn something new.

So don't think that you are a moron or an idiot. We all start from scratch.

#
**eegocentrik**
t1_j28u8wa wrote

**xSteee** in **There’s just as many numbers between 0 and 1 as there is from 0 to infinity.** by **Resinate1**

Sure.

The .25 in 2.25 is the quotient of from 2 to 3 (1). 2+.25

Also, 2.25 is the quotient of 45 ÷ 2 or 45/2.

However, the OP said from 0 to 1, this is where my argument lies.

There are NOT the same amount of numbers from 0 to 1 as there are 0 to infinity.

There ARE the same number of ELEMENTS.

eegocentrikt1_jdtrrce wroteReply to

TIL James Nasmyth discovered fine scale solar features, which he painted in detail and called 'willow-leaf-shaped objects in 1860. Now known as solar granulation, their existence was disputed for many yearsbyOk_Copy5217...and Basketball