etesian_dusk
etesian_dusk t1_jbioscf wrote
Reply to comment by chris_myzel in [N] tinygrad 0.5.0 released by Balance-
Comparing package size to "sore sourcecode" size is kind of misleading. The pytorch codebase by itself isn't 1 GB.
Also, in most usecases, I'd rather have pytorch's versatility, than be able to brag about <1000 lines.
etesian_dusk t1_jb94rak wrote
Reply to comment by nucLeaRStarcraft in [N] tinygrad 0.5.0 released by Balance-
Ok, that doesn't sound like much. I don't understand why I should abandon standard and verified tools for this.
On top of that the whole "George Hotz Twitter internship" thing was just embarassing. I trust him to jailbreak playstations, but that's the end of it.
etesian_dusk t1_jb8yzec wrote
Reply to [N] tinygrad 0.5.0 released by Balance-
Why would I start using this today?
etesian_dusk t1_j9szzww wrote
Reply to [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
I wouldn't trust Yudkowski to build an MLP classifier from scratch. Hell, I wouldn't trust him solving the Titanic task on Kaggle with SciKit learn.
He's a captivating speaker, but similar to some other popular cultural-scientific faces (e.g. Jordan Peterson) I feel like he is 100% form, 0% substance (or the substance that is valuable, is not original, but common knowledge repackaged).
If you don't tune in to people without a Bachelor's degree giving health advice, I don't know why you should care of Yudkowski's view of AI.
etesian_dusk t1_j9f86r8 wrote
The question is not related to /r/MachineLearning
etesian_dusk t1_j7gz0bl wrote
Reply to comment by supersoldierboy94 in [D] Yann Lecun seems to be very petty against ChatGPT by supersoldierboy94
> in the dinner table
*at the dinner table
etesian_dusk t1_j7gp3f0 wrote
Reply to comment by supersoldierboy94 in [D] Yann Lecun seems to be very petty against ChatGPT by supersoldierboy94
>Lecun's fanbois for sure.
The fact that you have an unpopular, and in my opinion shallow, view of current NLP, isn't an argument for calling everyone else 'fanboys'
etesian_dusk t1_jca2or6 wrote
Reply to Modern language models refute Chomsky’s approach to language [R] by No_Draft4778
This looks like a glorified blogpost. It even has sensationalistic bits that add nothing to the subject
>there is no possibility that Trump understands prime numbers