fluffy_assassins
fluffy_assassins t1_jefjf6h wrote
Reply to comment by FaceDeer in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
Measure me think of sentient yogurt.
fluffy_assassins t1_jefeit1 wrote
Reply to The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
So true, because they only want gpt4 to stop, not the slower stuff that everyone else has!
fluffy_assassins t1_jefdvn7 wrote
Reply to comment by FreshSchmoooooock in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Probably, I can't afford lev treatments I'm sure.
fluffy_assassins t1_jefc3yb wrote
Reply to comment by webernicke in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
We get to explore the base nature of consciousness itself. Not bad.
fluffy_assassins t1_jefbyrc wrote
Reply to comment by FreshSchmoooooock in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Some of us are already there, and things can only get better. Nothing to lose. I feel bad about people who die of cancer a month before their particular cancer is cured. I have a feeling that could start happening soon.
fluffy_assassins t1_jefbkry wrote
Reply to comment by musicofspheres1 in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
More advancement in the next 12 months than in the last decade?
fluffy_assassins t1_jef98m1 wrote
Reply to comment by delphisucks in Goddamn it's really happening by BreadManToast
Where is all this processing power gonna come from? Aren't the quantity of chips kind of a hard wall?
fluffy_assassins t1_jeagaju wrote
Reply to comment by LiveComfortable3228 in Where do you place yourself on the curve? by Many_Consequence_337
It's not like that, I don't think.
It keeps going up and down... like "AI winters".
Just a question of when it has an up so high that the AI take over.
And that may... or may not be... on the current upwards slope. Who knows.
Not me!
fluffy_assassins t1_jeag48d wrote
Reply to comment by hellosandrik in Where do you place yourself on the curve? by Many_Consequence_337
Don't we all?
fluffy_assassins t1_jeag3b3 wrote
Slope of enlightenment.
Innovation Trigger was a game I played in the 1990's that used an AI character.
Trough of disillusionment? Chatbots on the web.
Enlightenment? Years ago seeing rudimentary AI-generated music on youtube videos.
Now I'm just like... dafuq...
fluffy_assassins t1_je9ytga wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
You're just a dick.
fluffy_assassins t1_je9yspt wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
You're a dick.
fluffy_assassins t1_je9yr9a wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
You're a dick.
fluffy_assassins t1_je9yqvi wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
You're a dick.
fluffy_assassins t1_je9dwdw wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
"is it gonna swing a hammer? are we all just gonna keep pretending there isn't a nationwide skilled labor shortage? There's plenty of work to go around. Everyone just thinks they're too good for it."
We are talking about jobs, not skilled jobs.
People think they're too good for unskilled labor.
Labor that is skilled requires skills. If it was as simple as swinging a hammer, it wouldn't be skilled labor. So you're trying to talk about skilled labor like it's unskilled labor to transfer the blame to people who don't have the resources to acquire the skill and then claiming they think they're too good for your skilled labor when there's just no way they can do it.
Yeah, no.
fluffy_assassins t1_je7m2dn wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
No, I'm talking about a lot of issues with short staffing in general. If someone CAN do construction, and fit in with the other employees, and they don't? They are... A bit dim. But I can't blame someone for not wanting to get screamed at at McDonald's for minimum wage or pissing in a bottle for Amazon.
fluffy_assassins t1_je7ky6i wrote
Reply to comment by fool_on_a_hill in What are the so-called 'jobs' that AI will create? by thecatneverlies
People don't think they're too good for it, they just won't get treated like shit for shit wages.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je4fiaq wrote
Reply to comment by foobazzler in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Yeah, I'm curious about how CEOs will fight it more than anything. Power structures are gonna flip in their heads.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je4ff2t wrote
Reply to comment by cant-say-less-info in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Fine with me, but I'd love for that to be all they do. The board of directors will probably be replaced to when AI is better at profiting the shareholders...
fluffy_assassins t1_je277o9 wrote
Reply to comment by Paraphrand in Which communities have you found where people are both smart about what AI is and isn't currently capable of, but where everyone in there is convinced we'll have AI soon that's smarter than 95% of humans at all computer based tasks within a few years? by TikkunCreation
I'd always make to make clear when what I commented was from GPT
fluffy_assassins t1_je26k7k wrote
Reply to comment by Paraphrand in Which communities have you found where people are both smart about what AI is and isn't currently capable of, but where everyone in there is convinced we'll have AI soon that's smarter than 95% of humans at all computer based tasks within a few years? by TikkunCreation
Are we allowed to use GPT for our comments here?
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je1hcfg wrote
Reply to comment by bullettrain1 in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Ohh I've made some embarrassing comments because I thought I was in a different sub. Your points are still valid.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je1a1b6 wrote
Reply to comment by bullettrain1 in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
They wouldn't have the authority, they'd get the money and take the credit.
But the AI would have the authority and decision-making.
The CEO's "tool" would be making the decisions and that could go both ways but hey, it'd be change.
fluffy_assassins OP t1_je15c3z wrote
Reply to comment by qepdibpbfessttrud in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
I agree, however I do think an AI will have to be FAR superior to executives to really threaten their power.
fluffy_assassins t1_jefka9w wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in The only race that matters by Sure_Cicada_4459
What is the same company simultaneously releases 2 AGI, to check and balance eachother?