OP probably got banned after an argument due to trying to find vague connections to past philosophizing while presenting it as relevant towards understanding modern quantum mechanics interpretations with rigour.

The attitude that you're referring to I really don't think exists with any significant passion in the physics community.

I'm having a very hard time linking your article to the many worlds interpretation in QM with any amount of rigour.

Nobody thinks (I hope) that postulating some vague assertions about "many worlds" is a novel 20th century idea. The importance in the physics world is, at most, the connection to understanding the wave function.