This is barely passable as philosophy, Its a clickbait headline and the article doesn’t talk about anything meaningful, it’s all “what the world would look like if I had my way” And banality of evil? What does that even mean? A concept that may or may not exist outside of human perception, is unoriginal? I’m not sure what the purpose of that is other then just throwing big words into your title to make it sound better. I’ll figure out the problem for you. How do you make code in a computer, that has no emotional capacity, follow your moral principles? You code it differently. 🤯
gorillasnthabarnyard t1_j248ysa wrote
Reply to How the concept: Banality of evil developed by Hanna Arendt can be applied to AI Ethics in order to understand the unintentional behaviour of machines that are intelligent but not conscious. by AndreasRaaskov
This is barely passable as philosophy, Its a clickbait headline and the article doesn’t talk about anything meaningful, it’s all “what the world would look like if I had my way” And banality of evil? What does that even mean? A concept that may or may not exist outside of human perception, is unoriginal? I’m not sure what the purpose of that is other then just throwing big words into your title to make it sound better. I’ll figure out the problem for you. How do you make code in a computer, that has no emotional capacity, follow your moral principles? You code it differently. 🤯