gotok1324
gotok1324 OP t1_j244ber wrote
Reply to comment by DWW256 in How should real flatness sound like? by gotok1324
Is there any variant to the Harman target that's meant to be completely flat?
gotok1324 OP t1_j20cpjn wrote
Reply to comment by TheFrator in How should real flatness sound like? by gotok1324
I just read the page. Very interesting subject, specially about the changes the Fletcher Munson curve had and ended up being actually close to what we have today as the standard. Thank you!
gotok1324 OP t1_j206shw wrote
Reply to comment by ----_________------ in How should real flatness sound like? by gotok1324
Thank you! Some time ago I tried to match my little USB speakers to the sound of my headphones calibrated to the Harman target, and I managed to get a pretty decent sound, even from these cheap speakers! I'll try to do it using pink noise though, sounds interesting
gotok1324 OP t1_j205eb3 wrote
Reply to comment by The_D0lph1n in How should real flatness sound like? by gotok1324
Oh! Never really linked the points hahah The frequencies I tend to turn down when doing this are really the ones in the 2k-4k range, which is where we have the Harman peak... Thank you!!
Submitted by gotok1324 t3_zxg98y in headphones
gotok1324 t1_j2amy0u wrote
Reply to HD660s Harman Target sounds way worse? by SlowestSundew7
Maybe the Q factor is too wide for the bands. Try something like Wavelet. It has presets from Jaakkopasanen built in