Fuck that. You leave, you don't get to still try to milk it.

Of course. It’s big business.

Ok that’s a very different question than what’s in your post

Based on that response I don’t think you’re actually interested in learning anything, but no, they are not just putting a wall in. They’re raising the entire level.

If it comes out anything like the renderings it’s quite beautiful, if very different.

Yes because what most people want is a 10’ wall hemming them off from the water view.

>I'm guessing from a company who got there first and are doing nothing with it?

Why would you guess that? AM/FM stations can't be silent for more than 1 year (and often less than that... they have to inform the FCC within 10 *days* of going silent) or they lose their license.

There's a reason they aren't issuing more...

Hell if I know. I’m just saying they’re not just saying poor decisions were the fault of simple workers working from home.

>SVB failed because of investment decisions that would have had to have been helmed by the absolute highest level of management.

They included executives and management being spread out as one of the problems...

SVB didn't invest in crypto or in anything particularly risky...

I always park on site. The lots are $7-$10/day, and have weekly discounts.

You can get as low as $5/day offsite.

Starship, I guess.

Because I have to sit here and grumble about there being no SLS/Artemis launch this year.

Wow you so smaaaart

The bar

Hasn’t Temple Grill been gone for a while now?

I did the same 15 years ago, returning from Boston

The problem is that fixing this basically requires that everyone *not* be able to get loans... which is "unfair"

That’s the supply rate. Not delivery.

Edit:

User ghost edited. His current statement is nothing like it was, and now is completely irrelevant to the conversation. The AG’s statement he is now linking to also doesn’t say what he thinks it does. All it says is that electricity in CT is expensive. Nobody was arguing that.

/u/Kolzig32189 should be concerned with splitting between supply and delivery, since one is ES and the other is a pass through rate. There is no point to this entire thread of the conversation that he’s replying to if we aren’t concerned with what is what.

It’s amazing how people still don’t understand this despite the microscope ES has been under for the last year. And you’re clearly a shill if you point it out.

No one was arguing with you on the delivery side. But the delivery side is irrelevant to OP’s question.

If you want an argument on the delivery side though, delivery increases have been below the inflation rate for years. They certainly have not tripled. As someone else pointed out, they’ve increased under 16% in 6 years. I haven’t checked his math but if you have better info, let us know.

This is the bullshit logic that results in answers like 'compete under a neutral flag'.

If that's actually how it worked, you'd be right. But the Olympics are actually a system of a country showing how impressive they are - especially when you're talking about the top few countries - and nobody fucking believes that the athletes aren't Russian just because they don't have a Russian flag on.

You punish the athletes because the athletes are competing under the auspices of a government. The same reason you punish the people of Russia (or wherever) through economic sanctions even though those don't directly impact those in power.

>IOC can't just go banning athletes of countries because of the crimes their government commited. Very few countries would be left

They absolutely can, and have.

So, a bunch of bullshit, again.

I don’t know what that means (in context)?

He's just straight up wrong. The level of housing shortage in New Haven is insane.