Part of it has to be what's gone on in her life the last 15 years.

But Joan Jett is pretty damn accomplished as well

OK. I was talking in the US, for printed books. Since this article was based on a us lawsuit

There wouldn't have been a lawsuit if they keep to the controlled lending flow.

Only if you exclude their second paragraph.

They acknowledge the author only gets paid once, but that is better than zero.

The resale market is not the same as the piracy market.

They don't ON the lend. They do ON the single library purchase.

You downplayed sales. My bet it's one of indeeds biggest groups,

I don't understand why senator Warren's distant cousin is causing such a fuss

At a total cost of 105 billion, up from 33 billion. 10k jobs is depressing.

Yes, but that assumes you can get cell coverage, which is always a problem at hospitals :(

Usually the guest wifi is in a dmz, so joy there.

Also, you would have to be a pretty incompetent it team, to let any switch route any data from an unknown machine at a hospital.

I'm sure you could hack around and find a valid net mask and gateway, and then plug in with a static IP address, and hope they don't block you at the nearest switch.

I just think you would have to be computing locally without network access

Agreed. Only issue would be you getting access to it again. Your not getting on their network with the box, so you would have to go in person.

Why are you excusing the Dutch, German, British and Israeli foundations?

Sure you can. Armies kill each other all the time.

Yes it's an act of war, but it is not criminal under us code.

There is a difference between a natural tear and an episiotomy done to prevent that tear.

A preventative cut to expand the vagina, so the tearing and rupturing is controlled, has nothing to do with the "husband stich"

So I found this post very confusing.

If a woman ruptures during birth, should the doctor just say, oh well that's nature?

Extra/unnecessary medical procedures are illegal, just adding stitches on the hope/guess that it might make the vagina smaller, is illegal.

So what is the point of this post?

Good point. I misread. The pot company is based in Cali but this franchise was in IL.

So yes, they will refile in IL

So yeah, the fed court may (unlikely) dismiss it without prejudice, and then the landlord can absolutely refile in California and win