Thanks for your thoughtful reply

Art shouldn’t be considered divine. Neither should the expression of art. It’s an idealized notion to think that preserving art is preserving history, when at the same time society doesn’t care about preserving more important things that aren’t culturally functional to the prevailing zeitgeist. Art itself can be seen a gesture, and so is preserving or destroying it.

I mean personally I would preserve the art, but it’s a good debate worth engaging, but I honestly don’t think Jimmy Carr should be the one to facilitate it.