hazpat

hazpat t1_j5kmklt wrote

Are you an author on this? You sound offended that a person can use the same visual comparison techniques as the authors and come up with a different speculation. Each time you redundantly quote the article, it is a section that uses visual assessment to say the structures on these aquatic creatures "looks like" what land creatures use in combat.

In your opinion once an article is published it can't be incorrect and nobody should question it? Jenny McCarthy vibes on that.

−1

hazpat t1_j5jvg38 wrote

That paragraph is based on looking at the trident. Same as my opinion. The quad trident looks like it would work just as fine to stir sediment. Visually nothing indicates it would be less effective than 3 for sifting or fighting

0

hazpat t1_j5jop5i wrote

These tridents face down. Similar to elephant or boar tusks. They may be used in combat but they appear to be perfectly located to stir up mud as there primary purpose.

Beetle horns usually face out and up more like rhinos because there primary use is different.

0

hazpat t1_j5gt3ki wrote

The entire hypothesis is based around an individual with 4 spikes making it to adulthood.... since the malformed trident didnt impede survival it must be used in combat? at first glance, these look like they would also work great at disturbing mud in front of themselves while foraging...

23

hazpat t1_j296pjp wrote

What is that even supposed to mean? I'm "their prayer"? So they aren't praying for me, they are praying me? And they will find me? Total nonsense.

Is this random AI text added to a photo?

22