hex_ev
hex_ev t1_jacwmh7 wrote
Reply to comment by ItsAConspiracy in How much electricity required to hypothetically reverse manmade climate change? by armzngunz
Interesting, a more simple and practical solution
hex_ev t1_jac5vst wrote
Reply to How much electricity required to hypothetically reverse manmade climate change? by armzngunz
Just my humble, non physicist opinion, but we would need more energy than the energy previously hold in all that burnt fossil fuel, released over the decades to power civilization.
There are big power sources around. Light isotopes for nuclear fusion. Heavy elements for nuclear fission. The earth heat from the underground. And of course the biggest of them all, the Sun (my favorite idea being space based solar power collection).
We could also choose a very stable way to fix all this excess carbon in the world, like diamonds or silicon carbide. we could just dump "solid-state-global-warming" into the ocean floor and forget about it
But I believe we will struggle through global warming instead of reversing it. Because there is too much inertia, no political and economical will. No real global coordination to build so much infrastructure and so much technology. We will continue to deal with the problem by not dealing with it
hex_ev t1_jaembzj wrote
Reply to comment by Bored_guy_in_dc in Antarctic sea ice likely shrunk to a record low last week, US researchers said Monday, its lowest extent in the 45 years of satellite record-keeping by DoremusJessup
At least we'll get rid of Florida with sea level rise