hydraofwar t1_jef89y0 wrote

You're right, but I particularly believe that all our stored scientific information still has a lot to say, things that we humans haven't seen yet, and something that could decipher this, and very quickly, would be an AI.

What could bypass experimental validation would be quantum computing to simulate systems/environments.


hydraofwar t1_jef52df wrote

The AI ​​skeptics will be the ones who will be constantly saying that the current era's AI is not human level, they will say that even if we have 100% autonomous general purpose robots, then Sundar's claim could be right that it doesn't matter whether that is or it's not AGI


hydraofwar t1_j96r06y wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO

At the end of the day, either keeping AI for yourself or sharing it with the people is dangerous either way. But it's probably less dangerous to give access to the people than to keep it for the elite.