ihateshadylandlords
ihateshadylandlords t1_jds0o6t wrote
Reply to comment by eJaguar in How are you viewing the prospect of retirement in the age of AI? by Veleric
All the more to keep living your life until that point.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jdro2o2 wrote
Keep working/saving/investing as if AGI won’t arrive within the next 20 years. As much as we talk about it, none of us know when it’ll actually arrive and impact the world. I’ll keep putting money in index funds until AGI takes over and we’re all comfortably retired.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jdkm4nr wrote
I really hope robots are here by 2025. It would be nice for the robot to do housework on weekends while I spend more time with my family.
!RemindMe 2 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_jbfesrc wrote
> But a new study published today shows how a new drug called 'CADD522' blocks a gene associated with driving the cancer's spread, in mice implanted with human bone cancer. >The drug is now undergoing formal toxicology assessment before the team assemble all of the data and approach the MHRA for approval to start a human clinical trial.
So many things work in mice, but not in humans. Hopefully this one gets cleared and works in humans.
!RemindMe 7 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_jb76xgd wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235
lol you’re responding to my posts. I don’t know what I did to get your fixation though.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jb71d0f wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235
The block button is available, unless you struggle with that too.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jb6wg0u wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235
Sounds like you have a reading comprehension problem then.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jb5ktsj wrote
Reply to What might slow this down? by Beautiful-Cancel6235
We still haven’t been able to get through the bottleneck that is R&D and making products available to the masses once proof of concept is established. I see a lot of posts on here that involve proof of concept for great products. But they still have to test the products to make sure they don’t malfunction over a period of time. The products also have to be at a price to where the average person can afford them. A lot of things here will get shelved because they’re either not able to get the price down or it malfunctions too often and they can’t fix it.
I think it’ll be a long time before we can accelerate/refine that part of the production process.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jad8uuq wrote
Reply to Researchers from UNSW Sydney created a soft robot that can 3D bio-print inside the human body. by Dalembert
Cool, hopefully it leads to great things.
!RemindMe 10 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_ja56z4n wrote
Reply to The 2030s are going to be wild by UnionPacifik
I hope it’s wild and in a good way for all of us.
!RemindMe 12 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9p3huf wrote
lol we’re a long ways away from “robot waifus”. The first company to create actual robot waifus will take in billions from coomers. This is more proof-of-concept. Time will tell if their products will ever make it out of the lab and into production.
!RemindMe 7 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9oyvpy wrote
Reply to Seriously people, please stop by Bakagami-
/r/EnoughGPTSpam
Like we get it guys, you use Bing/GPT to be more efficient for work/projects and it has interesting responses. We don’t need 100 threads about the same product.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9mivic wrote
Reply to comment by veritoast in Why are we so stuck on using “AGI” as a useful term when it will be eclipsed by ASI in a relative heartbeat? by veritoast
There’s no hard and fast rule on defining AGI/ASI. I’ve seen where people consider AGI/ASI one and the same, and I’ve seen where they’re treated as separate concepts.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9cvt0a wrote
Most people don’t, because it doesn’t really affect them now. My wife doesn’t know much about AI, but she brought up the GPT conversations without me asking/telling her about it. So more people are learning about it and are becoming intrigued/excited/scared etc. of what AI could be.
I guarantee that people will care about AI really quickly as soon as it affects them personally. But we’re not at that point yet.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9bucch wrote
Still in the lab as far as it goes for the average consumer. But hopefully that changes over the next decade and it can result in tangible benefits for the average person.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j9bhkxd wrote
Reply to Just 50 days into 2023 and there's so much AI development. Compiled a list of the top headlines. by cbsudux
Not that it’s not cool, but there’s a gulf between having proof of concept and having an actual product/service in production.
I think lists like these would gain more traction if they just stuck to things that the average consumer can use today.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j8xo5zc wrote
Reply to comment by grexovic in How will current AI or future AGI influence politics and political campaigning by grexovic
If it was programmed incorrectly, we would. Even with human politicians, we have a control problem. They do whatever the donors want and not what the constituents want.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j8x75qr wrote
Long term, we may have AI politicians. Why have a human politician who’s susceptible to corruption when you can have an AI programmed to help all of humanity instead of only helping out the donors?
ihateshadylandlords t1_j8g16du wrote
Reply to Is society in shock right now? by Practical-Mix-4332
Not at all. GPTChat is great, but can give confidently wrong answers. If/when it can give correct answers consistently, society may be shocked.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j89shbm wrote
Reply to comment by kaiww77 in Preparing everyone for the singularity by cocopuffs239
!RemindMe 20 years
ihateshadylandlords t1_j85shwf wrote
When do you think that will happen? It would be nice if it happened ASAP and worked out perfectly for all of humanity, but who knows if/when we get recursive self improvement.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j7zpw3b wrote
Reply to The copium goes both ways by IndependenceRound453
Agreed, we’re willing to admit that people who think that the tech is centuries away are coping. But by far and large, we’re not willing to admit that believing life will be radically changed within a decade is complete and utter copium.
I think as the 2020s go by, we’ll start to see /r/singularity become less hostile to people who think it’s decades away as life doesn’t change that much for the average person from now until then.
Of course I could be wrong and we’re all enjoying luxury space communism in 2030, so I guess will have to wait and see.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j7cfjsm wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Future of The Lower and Middle Class Post-Singularity, and Why You Should Worry. by ttylyl
…you can’t search the internet or think about expenses companies incur daily? I’ll give you one, cost of goods sold.
You’re being intentionally obtuse because you realize you’re wrong. Like I said initially, companies need money to function.
ihateshadylandlords t1_j787aj2 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Future of The Lower and Middle Class Post-Singularity, and Why You Should Worry. by ttylyl
Search any company’s income statement and look at the various line items for examples.
ihateshadylandlords t1_jegnjk9 wrote
Reply to Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
Cool, hope this leads to robots in the real world sooner rather than later.
!RemindMe 3 years