inactiveuser247
inactiveuser247 t1_jd86vor wrote
Reply to comment by KyojinkaEnkoku in Australia's oil and gas pipelines [OC] by ruthlesscattle
Nothing. Just a metric shit-ton of nothing.
inactiveuser247 t1_jd86lgr wrote
Reply to comment by amoss_303 in Australia's oil and gas pipelines [OC] by ruthlesscattle
Something like that. Also the Victorian coast
inactiveuser247 t1_jawgefw wrote
Reply to comment by divinitia in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
Sure, because your analogy isn’t equivalent to the original issue.
inactiveuser247 t1_javh3kp wrote
Reply to comment by divinitia in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
Can you tell how many peanuts are in the jar by counting how many times you take a peanut out of the jar, dust it off and then put it back?
inactiveuser247 t1_jatbor8 wrote
Reply to comment by srv50 in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
Doesn’t have to be linear. But if edits go up as content goes up and edits go down as content goes UP (I don’t think it’s defensible to say that Wikipedia shrank), then there isn’t a meaningful correlation.
inactiveuser247 t1_jatb7pl wrote
Reply to comment by ShelfordPrefect in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
So if edits go up, then content must have gone up, but if edits goes down, then content … goes up?
inactiveuser247 t1_jas0yu1 wrote
Reply to comment by srv50 in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
I think your logic is off. If there was a direct correlation that would mean that Wikipedia shrinks during the second half of the year and shrank overall between ‘07 and ‘10
inactiveuser247 t1_jas0rkb wrote
Reply to comment by someguyonline00 in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
Not if you believe that your point of view is the only correct one.
inactiveuser247 t1_jas0o6i wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Wikipedia Edits by Day, 2001–2010 by ptgorman
It doesn’t even show that it increased in size over time. The metric shown is the number of edits, not the number of new pages.
inactiveuser247 t1_j1lyle1 wrote
Reply to comment by Sadoksad in [OC] Christmas Homicides in California by academiaadvice
It’s been a shitty day to end a shitty year. Sorry about the snarkiness. Merry Christmas.
inactiveuser247 t1_j1ls45o wrote
Reply to comment by Sadoksad in [OC] Christmas Homicides in California by academiaadvice
You took something that’s uncommon and completely disregarded it.
inactiveuser247 t1_j1lpt7o wrote
Reply to comment by Sadoksad in [OC] Christmas Homicides in California by academiaadvice
Sometimes. You should hang out with some kids with FASD or serious development disorders.
inactiveuser247 t1_j1l7q50 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Christmas Homicides in California by academiaadvice
The argument from the freakonomics guy is that in around 96 the generation who were born once abortion was legalised started to become adults. At that time you had a huge reduction in the number of kids being born into situations where they were unwanted/ couldn’t be cared for/ or there were drugs etc involved. With that reduction came a matching reduction in the number of people growing up to be disfunctiknal adults.
Or something like that.
inactiveuser247 t1_ivnadhk wrote
Reply to comment by 685327592 in More people are employed in clean energy than in fossil fuels by kickresume
You would prefer it, but one of the features of disruptive technologies is that initially they won’t beat the existing tech in every metric. Over time they might, but that’s not the point.
Fossil fuels are pretty efficient now because we’ve had hundreds of years to perfect their extraction and build up their scale. If we were still reliant on people mining coal with picks and shovels and drilling for oil with tiny little drill rigs on land then that labour efficiency would tank.
inactiveuser247 t1_is7vfss wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Police Killings per Capita v Homicide Rate per Capita for Select OECD Countries [OC] by dr5c
There’s a hell of a lot more people than there are police, so it’s reasonable
inactiveuser247 t1_jdahq4n wrote
Reply to How do you make the bed when the dog and the cat both want to help? by linda-stanley
Buy a second bed