invisiblesock

invisiblesock t1_iqxngj8 wrote

>I'd be interested in where you got the terrible efficiency data from.

most peaker plants use single cycle gas turbines, which have fairly low efficiency. it's usually in the low 30s for newer plants depending if the plant has heat exchangers to cool the incoming air.

there are also peaker plants that use reciprocating engines, these ones have even worse efficiency.

standard combined cycle gas thermal plants have a second cycle that uses the waste heat from the first cycle to increase the efficiency; in this case it's between 40% and 60%.

1

invisiblesock t1_iqt4gzc wrote

Because much of the infrastructure isn't there or it hasn't been modified to support hydrogen. There will definitely be a hydrogen economy in the future, but that's still in the future.

Renewables need to be funded and built, investments need to be redirected into emerging technologies necessary for the production, transportation and use of hydrogen, e.g., electrolyzers, hydrogen turbines, fuel cells, hydrogen storage, subsidies and policies need to be created to make hydrogen appealing to hard-to-decarbonise industries.

I think everyone understands that a hydrogen economy will have to emerge very soon, but this is a thing with a lot of moving parts, so it's going to take a lot of effort (& money) to make it happen. There are also uses, for which hydrogen will simply not be feasible anytime soon, so other approaches will have to be pursued (e.g. heating and light vehicles).

0