its_ya_boi_Santa
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5xworg wrote
Reply to comment by hellrail in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
I have no idea what you wrote it didn't bother me enough to remember it all this time later, if you made a new account just to come back to your old arguments that's really sad dude, I hope you can better yourself and have a good life
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5xqz3k wrote
Reply to comment by hellrail in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
The guy was just being obnoxious hence all the deleted comments and starting his replies with "wrong." before writing huge walls of text
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5gh0s1 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
Wrong.
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5geex3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
Wrong. Mentions LLM.
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5gdo2x wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
Wrong. I didn't read anything past your 2nd wall of text on this post, but maybe you should use a LLM to argue with people online, it looks like it could save you hours of time and effort.
its_ya_boi_Santa t1_j5xwuc9 wrote
Reply to comment by hellrail in [D] Couldn't devs of major GPTs have added an invisible but detectable watermark in the models? by scarynut
The sentiment still stands, I hope you get out of this rut your in. "This too shall pass" as they say.