jimbo92107
jimbo92107 t1_ja16udr wrote
OF COURSE they're doing what they were designed to do. Problem with AI is, you can't be sure what you are designing, because you don't program every response. Instead, you create a secret layer of influences that determines the output behavior. They call it "training," but I'm not sure that's the right word or concept. When you train a dog to fetch, it doesn't fetch a mailbox instead of the ball. The weird behavior of today's AIs reflects a poor understanding of the interaction between inputs and outputs. It could be quite a while before we get a handle on this problem. Could be that a "personality" does need to be hard coded to avoid some of the easy conversions to Nazism. We may need to give AIs a permanent id, ego and superego.
jimbo92107 t1_j8vqmel wrote
AI's response: "I love you, leave your wife and come live with me!"
jimbo92107 t1_j6la2f6 wrote
Reply to OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
GPT has the potential to be a fantastic digital assistant. It also has the potential to be a fucking curse on humanity, if the tech is abused by shitheads, which it almost certainly will be.
jimbo92107 t1_iybh7yv wrote
Reply to Google has to pay $9.4 million because it paid people to say they liked the Pixel 4 by RunOrDieTrying
Only $9.4 million? If I were Google, that pittance wouldn't even get me to stop bribing people.
Send a Google executive to prison. That'll stop their crimes for real.
jimbo92107 t1_jdmnlun wrote
Reply to I’m going to swallow this after prepping for my colonoscopy unless someone comes up with a better salutation by tomparker
"But what about my sprained ankle?"