A good first step towards transparency is that, if you're going to quote ChatGPT, you should say that you are quoting ChatGPT's output, provide the context of what prompt or question it was responding to, and say when you asked. Just like quoting a person, the quote can be an accurate quote, even if the person being quoted was wrong about something.

> "Without transparent referencing, students are forbidden to use the software for the production of any written work or presentations, except for specific course purposes, with the supervision of a course leader,"

In other words, the University issued reasonable guidelines, such as that you should label ChatGPT output accurately. Hardly a "ban."

> They definitely DON'T need you to show up to a physical site.

And, when your employer disagrees with you on that (such as TikTok requiring employees to come in at least 2 days a week), sometimes you have to find another job that supports the kind of remote work you want to do.

In the end, I think the employers that support remote and hybrid work in the most flexible manner will end up better prepared to recruit and retain the best workers, but people need to be willing to get up and leave, even during a dip in the tech job market, if they are going to make sure they maintain their flexibility.

> while lying to their employer about where they are.

That's not what the article is about. In this case, "TikTok sent a tough warning to a group of US employees whose home address didn't match their office address. "

TikTok is trying to require employees to come into the office "at least twice a week" and wants to know which employees aren't going to be able to do that.