Pay for that Twitter account!

👍

K....

"I’m sorry but isn’t the right famous for attacking potential voters?" what!? I think crazy is as crazy does and doesn't really have a partisan affiliation... But if we really wanna go down that route I'd be more than happy to stack up the damage and loss of life with your January 6th argument against the Chaz/Chop, BLM "mostly peaceful protests" any day of the week to isolate who tends to be more violent on the political spectrum but I digress...

Now in regards to your central argument that there is a hypothetical court that determines who has a valid stand on retaining or having their 2A rights restricted OUTSIDE of committing and being found guilty of an act like a felony or domestic violence that would preclude them from owning a firearm (something we both probably agree is a good thing for at least a period of time) Can you, and this is an honest question, can you fathom any situation or circumstance where this could be abused or bastardised and result in a law abiding citizen being stripped of their ability to defend themselves until a committee of likely unelected bureaucratic officials deem it safe? Could that system be weaponized?

If you agree so, is that just collateral damage you're willing to accept for the greater good?

if not, do you then hold the position that such a court would be somehow foolproof in ensuring NO ONE EVER lost their 2nd amendment rights unjustly?

Attacking the person and not the argument is not a good look when speaking to potential Constituents...

besides that and going back to the substance of the argument with my question that has not yet been answered is the following... What mechanism specifically, that does not currently exist, (I'm aware felons cannot vote or own firearms legally.) would exist to determine when an individual gets their rights restrained or revoked by committee? what criteria? again why shouldn't that apply to other rights?

AND I actually have no problem with updating Amendments... that's specifically how our government has been set up and we've done it MULTIPLE times... I do have a problem with any elected egomaniac wannabe tyrant trying to circumvent a process designed for, by and of the people just to fit their short term political whims because their position actually ISN'T strong enough to be fulfilled or realized through the intended process.

Also... specifically what is the purpose of the second amendment?

Okay... so really nothing in regards to addressing open carry... just reminding business owners of their already existing rights to restrict open carry on their private property.

In regards to "Increasing red flag laws" Specifically when does the government get to come take your 2nd amendment away? by what committee? based on what non already existing crietea or crime should one be barred from their 2nd amendment right? Why not also extend that to the first amendment? Some peoples speech is just too dangerous...

Also Orlando in St. Louis he was literally blocked by the FBI during his background check and had to buy that piece of garbage with no hand guard from a private individual.

Explain your 2A stance in more elaborate detail please.

Who in addition to those who are already legally barred from owning firearms would you seek to restrict or impede access to?

Also how do you intend on limiting the constitutional right that is Open carry?

Not loaded questions (pun absolutely intended) but sincere questions that you'll have to address clearly if you want to be taken seriously at all in Missouri.

The Ents have gotten away with not paying taxes for decades now... it's about time if you ask me.

What type of person do you want to work with? What's your preferred communication style?

"Truth Dispensary"

I would highly recommend looking at Wisper before the other company you mentioned.

As someone who spent some time working for one of these aforementioned companies I'd recommend looking at Wisper internet first....

I need more car washes... why is that not an option in this biased poll?!?!

here here

K. Cool, Thanks.

Thank you for your contribution.

I just think it's hilarious that you invested all that time to talk AT me in a screed vs simply asking a question or two to test the veracity of my statement and explore an alternative viewpoint to find out of I was a vapid stupid redneck or not...

how is it that you're so confident of my depth and breadth of knowledge on the subject?

Seems like you're making the confidently gross generalization with only minimal knowledge available to you champ...

Just know you're only getting downvoted because you're speaking truth in a largely left leaning echo chamber that are most city subreddits.

A low cost of living was ONE reason many people were leaving certain states for other states...

For some super strange reason there's been a lot more California, New York, Washington and Oregon plates over the past few years... I'm sure there's absolutely nothing to glean or reflect on there though...