So OpenAi gets all the revenue from online advertising, and ends up removing the incentive to publish new content, limiting the usefulness of the LLM because it will be 'stuck in time' in a sense.( Not sure if this is a fair assessment )

Do you think the influx of data they get from our interactions with Chatgpt can make up for the existence of human writers updating google ( and the web) with new data/information as it emerges in real life?

How will ai add anything to the conversation if its stuck in time?

I think this is the most sensible take I've heard on the future of written content but how feasible do you think it is in terms of computation? Sounds like youd need a whole new artificial intelligence just for ads to pull it off, and then somehow integrate it with the LLM.

Sorry if its stupid I know nothing about AI. I'm a content writer with existential dread and severe whiplash from all this hype.

Ultimately, we need a system to incentivise human writers otherwise I dont see LLMs scaling

That would be a new era of publishing. A new content ecosystem and a complete redesign of how revenue is shared. Google isn't releasing lambda because they don't have the answer. SEO is on its death bed and no one knows how to make a sustainable ecosystem because the rise of Chatgpt will eliminate most of the current incentives to publish content that will eventually be needed to update the LLMs.