kylepatel24
kylepatel24 t1_j0qad0a wrote
Reply to comment by Fromgre in DOD Office Moving Ahead in Mission to Identify 'Anomalous Phenomena by DragonfruitOdd1989
I think theres a big disconnect from the more public side of the government and the military complex. It seems that congress and the pentagon perhaps aren’t too clued in on certain top end classified projects, and have no idea what military contractors may possess, and i think this is creating a concern for them, its a clear divide in authority.
Recently the government were supposed to produce a report on UAP, and they haven’t. Just before the dead line, congress asked all of the government agencies to produce all their UAP related data spanning back to 1945, and the Navy openly denied the request and stated its a matter of national security.
In essence, theres a disconnect here, the individuals in the military complex have classified projects, research based projects most likely, and this data is being denied to congress and henceforth the pentagon.
Recent NDAA 2023 bill was passed and within stated a clause in regards to ‘whistleblower’ protection for individuals with NDAs in any federal government agency and also military contractors employees to give testimony.
“(A) any event relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena; and (B) any activity or program by a department or agency of the Federal Government or a contractor of such a department or agency relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, including with respect to material retrieval, material analysis, reverse engineering, research and development, detection and tracking, developmental or operational testing, and security protections and enforcement.”
In my opinion they are definitely trying to close this gap of classification between the ‘two sides’, and it may not just be about only UAP/UFOs.
kylepatel24 t1_j0q7s12 wrote
Reply to comment by Jaded_Prompt_15 in DOD Office Moving Ahead in Mission to Identify 'Anomalous Phenomena by DragonfruitOdd1989
Clearly there are more reports, more government interest, more military interest, more intelligence interest, more university interest, the list goes on and on, never before has there been this much of a effort for UAP.
kylepatel24 t1_iyaneaj wrote
Reply to comment by TheGingerBeardsman in Extragalactic SETI looks for life beyond the Milky Way. But where? In game theory one solution is a Schelling point — a single event that draws different group's attention. A binary neutron star merger could act as one, because observers across the universe will all be looking in the same direction. by EricFromOuterSpace
You probably would need to make distance a completely negligible factor in travel for this, you would have to make it so you could travel instantaneously to visit the complete opposite of the universe. The problem is, obviously these galaxies on the other side of the universe probably are moving away from us at a ridiculous velocities, to the point that you could not catch up to them perhaps.
You would some how have to have the energy to accelerate to FTL and likely not stop accelerating at any given point for x amount of time to outpace the movement of the galaxies.
I feel like some manipulation of quantum physics or dimensional science could be the real route for space travel, i don’t believe physically travelling point A to B is our real end goal.
kylepatel24 t1_iyam1b6 wrote
Reply to comment by AnAdvancedBot in Extragalactic SETI looks for life beyond the Milky Way. But where? In game theory one solution is a Schelling point — a single event that draws different group's attention. A binary neutron star merger could act as one, because observers across the universe will all be looking in the same direction. by EricFromOuterSpace
I agree, we likely have been staring at the skies for millions of years, even before we reached our ‘modern human’ point of evolution I imagine we looked to the skies and wandered what it all was about for a lot longer than we would like to give credit to.
I find it hard to believe we will ever get close to another intelligent life form to the point of a handshake, we might end up picking bio-signatures in the composition of far away planets atmosphere, perhaps even signs of artificial lighting, but that does not mean we will ever actually go there, if science is still lacking we might still not have a effective way to make the distance of space near negligible, then we have problems.
To me, from that point it makes sense that we end up sending some sort of drone technology there, even if it takes 1000 years to get there and Humans are all dead, its still contact in some format.
My point is, even at this current stage of technology we realistically and absolutely could send drones to pretty much every close by potentially habitable planet.
Im in full belief that if we ever do experience ET, it will actually be their technology sent here, nice little care package if you will.
kylepatel24 t1_j34ynpf wrote
Reply to comment by Good_Management7353 in Detecting life on Saturn moon Enceladus would require 100 flybys through its geyser plume, study suggests. by EricFromOuterSpace
When they mean ‘life’ they mean single cell life, and it is actually known that bacterium can survive in the vacuum of space.