lacgibra
lacgibra t1_ixydtjy wrote
Reply to comment by AttackOnTiddi in Can you help me think of this artist? by AttackOnTiddi
Try websites like https://www.chosic.com/find-song-by-lyrics/ https://findmusicbylyrics.com/ while the other redditors about to reply.
lacgibra t1_ixw2ey4 wrote
Reply to comment by lacgibra in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
I'm simply saying, I apply gravity as space-time curve when I apply the Einstein's relativity in action. If had explained the question in the first scenario using relativity, I would've mentioned gravity as space time curve
lacgibra t1_ixw20m9 wrote
Reply to comment by eldude2879 in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
Okay do me a favour, workout a classical problem considering gravity as curved space time. Simple pendulum, compound pendulum, linear Harmonic oscillator two body problem anything.
lacgibra t1_ixw0h05 wrote
Reply to comment by eldude2879 in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
Well yeah Newton's doesn't explain Mercury's precession. I were sticking the context of the questioner and I had mentioned defining it classically, you need to think what it is when required. You can't just tell all the concepts that neglected friction, air resistance are wrong, for the classical assumption gravity has to be assumed as force. Relativity got better explanation apsidal precession and all at the end of the day approximately g = 9.81 m/s². Not lower than that or higher than that.
lacgibra t1_ixvevls wrote
Reply to comment by phrankjones in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
The comment above still fits, You can obtain mass of the earth by doing the simple pendulum method to obtain g from the equation √g = 2π√L/T
g = earth's gravity L = length of the pendulum T = time period
Note that simple pendulum give adequate answers for small angles only, if you swing the pendulum to wide you won't br arriving at the earth's gravity.
then equate it with g = GM/r²
lacgibra t1_ixuglp0 wrote
Reply to comment by Humble_Indication798 in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
Yeah right, the only change would depends whether spaceship or the object is bound to the system or not ( planet's atmosphere then the distance between them would be radius of the planet ), if it's extra planetary then the r would be distance between them, pretty much the same.
lacgibra t1_ixue9eg wrote
Are you speaking about Newton's law of gravitation? It's used to obtain force of attraction between two planets or it's satellites, which is deduced from f_g = G m_1 m_2/r²
f_g is force of attraction,
G is universal gravitational constant
m_1 mass of the planet
m_2 mass of the other planet
r is distance between them.
The above problem is otherwise called two body problem as well which turns into complicate when you apply classical mechanics
The formula for gravity of the planet obtained from the above equation as folloing as
We know that f = mg and also f = GmM/r²
Here g is gravity due to acceleration G is gravitational constant. m is mass of the object in the earth. M is mass of the earth.
Since the object is bound to the planet the r distance between them would be radius of the planet itself Thus r is radius of the earth
mg = GmM/r²
And you get g = GM/r²
I would suggest you to look into two body problem and barycentre you might find it relevant.
lacgibra t1_iybna3g wrote
Reply to comment by eldude2879 in How would one calculate the gravity of a planet? by LoreCriticizer
Yeah yeah quantum mechanics is wrong too, because it's foundation was laid by classical mechanics.