lameth
lameth t1_iy86iol wrote
Reply to 5 Connecticut police officers charged after Black man left paralyzed following ride in police van by AudibleNod
Brings a much darker meaning to the phrase they use:
"You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride."
lameth t1_jcajkxc wrote
Reply to comment by Mrsparkles7100 in U.S. government agencies may have been double billed for projects in Wuhan, China, records indicate; probe launched by Jamalginsbergback
As someone who has been responsible for property disposition (though much, much lower in cost) within the Army, I can entirely see how this happened.
Let's say you report something as broken. For whatever reason, it cannot be repaired. You are keeping it on your books until you get your replacement. The replacement comes in, and you now have the task of turning the old one in to be destroyed/decommissioned. You assume (or are told) the new one has been already added to the property book. However, the new one hasn't. For a while, the old one is retained on the property book until the new one is in the system. Whenever you do your property count (by serial number), it is noted the new one is the replacement for the old one, with the turn-in paperwork for the old one maintained as proof.
Suddenly the old one is off the books, new one isn't on it. Huh, that's odd... So you go to the records office and get the new serial number added to the system. You're done, right? Not necessarily. Just because locally it is fixed, doesn't mean it is in the centralized database.
Accountability of high value items is a pain, and in my case it was left to someone that had 2 years in the army and took a 40-hour class in security and record keeping.