Exactly.
Requiring a licence for "chatting with GPT-3" is silly.
It would be like requiring a licence to talk to a child (albeit a very knowledgeable child with a tendency to make stuff up). You would not allow such kid to write your homework or thesis, would you?
Maybe requiring reading a warning akin to "watch out, the cup is hot", would make more sense for this use case.
lukasz_lew t1_ja9jsrf wrote
Reply to comment by bitemenow999 in [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted]
Exactly.
Requiring a licence for "chatting with GPT-3" is silly.
It would be like requiring a licence to talk to a child (albeit a very knowledgeable child with a tendency to make stuff up). You would not allow such kid to write your homework or thesis, would you?
Maybe requiring reading a warning akin to "watch out, the cup is hot", would make more sense for this use case.