mcchanical

mcchanical t1_j6ctb5o wrote

I get something like this occasionally but I have really bad eating habits and often it's in a morning after I've been drinking, so I always put it down to my body just craving easy nutrients and actual hydration. I find milk very addictive sometimes but I always have, it's just so easy to pound a carton of milkshake and feel satiated with a bit of fat, protein, water and sugar.

No visual issues yet but I will always keep advice like this in mind. I see it a lot on Reddit and occasionally I do wonder about the normality of my eating habits sometimes.

1

mcchanical t1_j17izqb wrote

I'm not attacking the US. I'm responding to an american saying that European space agencies aren't doing enough to compensate for the lack of viable launch vehicles. Russia and the US built their space programs as the backdrop for dominating the other in the Cold War, and invested unprecedented public funds into doing so. The rest of the world is doing their best without war funds, and shouldn't be held responsible for the lack of viable launch providers. Especially when the lauch provider here is very reliable in general.

1

mcchanical t1_j17hqt2 wrote

NASA was still using it well beyond the point where it became unavailable, so whether they knew about it or not, the space agency funded by the leading Western economy wasn't prepared and had to fall back on a private company that it was lucky to be able to call upon.

SpaceX has done a lot for space exploration in general. Everyone relies on them, and neither Europe nor the US as geopolitical entities can claim credit for sustaining the ability to service the space industry. The entire industry needs to catch up.

0

mcchanical t1_j0a2uo9 wrote

What? When did I say there weren't? Yes there are many fusion projects. They may produce power in 20 years, maybe 50, either way it needs to be pursued.

And who said anything about waiting? You are aware that humanity as a species can tackle multiple problems at the same time, yes? Fusion scientists don't work on Co2, they studied fusion, not greenhouse gases. Other people who got degrees relevant to climate change are working on that seperately.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say...that fusion physicists should go back to college and get different degrees?

1

mcchanical t1_j0a1esb wrote

This machine isn't in any way designed to produce usable energy. It's a brute force way to push the boundaries of our understanding of how fusion works. They never factored efficiency into the design. Obviously a prototype plant would use more expensive, more efficient designs.

The whole design of NIF could never be a power plant. It's a very expensive, one shot experiment that explores principles that can help guide the development of more sensible designs like tokamaks.

2