It may not actually be an effective substitute for real medical care/treatment but it will generate publicity and may translate into more votes for team blue, so it must be a win for overall society, right?

Economics: https://youtu.be/1GviwAknP08

I'm not sure what your point is either

It's almost as if price controls don't work. Someone in California should take an economics 101 class.

[Florida (318,855), Texas (230,961), and the Carolinas – North Carolina (99,796) and South Carolina (84,030) – were the states with the most net domestic migration gains in 2022. 

However, California (-343,230), New York (-299,557), and Illinois (-141,656) experienced the largest net domestic outmigration. ](https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/economists-outlook/where-people-moved-in-2022#:~:text=Twenty%2Dsix%20states%20experienced%20an,domestic%20migration%20gains%20in%202022.)

Have you seen where people are migrating to? Out of New York and California, and into Florida and Texas. People are voting with their feet.

I thought blue states were sanctuary states for immigrants though.

I have absolutely nothing with getting away from oil. But you literally just said "we should fine oil companies for selling oil" and "we can't ban oil because we need it". See the contradiction? Also, I'm not sure what the crime is. Don't you think we should actually have a statute that we follow, instead of fine companies based on how we feel on Thursday? Rule of law seems to be an importantt concept.

But if it's illegal why aren't we banning it?

So let's ban oil and watch how fast the world crumbles apart.

Agreed. That logic is pretty retarded. Selling oil is criminal but buying oil isn't criminal? What a fucking double standard.

This is retarded. It makes equally as much sense to sue everyone who fills up their car with gasoline.