micaroma
micaroma t1_j9dzqps wrote
Reply to comment by diabeetis in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
Though I wouldn't say that ChatGPT is "literally everywhere", it certainly isn't limited to "tech weirdos". Plenty of non-tech people are using it for work and school, or are simply aware of it from the extensive news coverage or TikToks.
micaroma t1_j3469ny wrote
Reply to comment by LarsPensjo in I asked ChatGPT if it is sentient, and I can't really argue with its point by wtfcommittee
"But that is also beside the point, there was an improvement while the sessions lasted."
Really? That seems like the most important factor of "self-improvement". If it only improved its error in the session but makes the same error if you refresh the page, then it didn't improve itself, it simply improved its output. There's a huge difference between permanently upgrading your own capabilities from external input, and simply fixing text already written on the page with external input.
(Also, it sometimes continues to make the same error within the same session even after pointing out its mistake, which is greater evidence against true self-improvement.)
micaroma t1_it9i2co wrote
Reply to comment by DrKrepz in Thoughts on Job Loss Due to Automation by Redvolition
AI has been generating images that customers would use (and are using) rather than images created by humans. That's what matters when we're talking about job replacement. Whether said images are "art" is irrelevant.
micaroma t1_j9e7qon wrote
Reply to comment by No-Swan5683 in Does anyone else feel people don't have a clue about what's happening? by Destiny_Knight
Okay. That doesn't make anything I said untrue.