mikemd1

mikemd1 t1_j91iyj7 wrote

It's a meta analysis published in the extremely well respected peer reviewed journal lancet. It looks at 65 studies from 19 countries. I'd wager its extremely high quality research unless this Doctor from UCSF has decided to put his entire career in jeopardy.

−1

mikemd1 t1_j91i5yl wrote

From the author of the meta analysis (if you read the article):

>“The problem of saying ‘I’m gonna get infected to get immunity’ is you might be one of those people that end up in the hospital or die,” Murray said. “Why would you take the risk when you can get immunity through vaccination quite safely?”

He's a researcher reporting on the results of his research in one of the most respected peer reviewed medical journals, not an anti-vaxxer FFS.

24