misspellted

misspellted t1_j9cp0e6 wrote

Reply to comment by s416a in [Image] Be selfless. by otaku_108

Depending on your beliefs, you might not agree with me, but...

Humans didn't just start flying at the snap of some fingers.

They had to acquire the DNA of those organisms who could fly, and, well, flies are easier to capture than birds, so..

1

misspellted t1_j6kjnaj wrote

Nope.

You do not belong.

You lost the money, sure.

But the people who do always ask "Should I tell my wife?" or "How do I tell my partner??!?!?!".

This last requirement is why your admission to the guild has been delayed.

3

misspellted t1_iy6gnfz wrote

In attempting to open the Dark Theme link anonymously:

> The page isn’t redirecting properly > >An error occurred during a connection to drive.google.com. > > This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to accept cookies.

1

misspellted t1_iu3d36l wrote

Yes.

One needs to identify what defines the worth, how to assess the worth, and how to ascribe one's self to that identity and assessment. That takes rules, guidelines, et cetera, in order to make the "worth" mean something.

Sure, the rule could be "I exist, therefore I have worth.". But.. that's a rule.

2

misspellted t1_iu2vs99 wrote

"Mr. Musk, I hear the CEO position is open. I hereby tender this hastily drawn-in-crayon resume... or is it.. CV.. I don't know.. but for your consideration. Thanks!"

6

misspellted t1_it9uz8c wrote

Well, I'm not sure you can actually delineate here. First off, the progressing space agency wouldn't be a progressing one if it hasn't made any accomplishments (funding would dry up quick without any promising research), and it would have to have leading figures to even get any kind of initial funding in the first place, whether or not they are/have had space related careers or are the source of funding the venture/agency.

On the other hand, an already-accomplished space agency doesn't mean you can't have the potential to become one if it's leading figures, especially as it talent moves on to other ventures or retirement.

Doing space things requires non-space financial clout, and that doesn't come with a greenhorn straight out of university or college. They may have grand plans and ideas, but... they are yet not established in the community sufficient enough to command the kinds of funds required to start a space agency on their own. Therefore, even a progressing space agency has to have accomplishments under its belt with figures capable of leading the agency to its current situation.

I think the question can be phrased better.

> Would you rather work in a space agency or a space venture?

3