mistaekNot
mistaekNot t1_jaj4cfi wrote
Reply to comment by questioillustro in NASA’s DART data validates kinetic impact as planetary defense method | DART altered the orbit of the asteroid moonlet Dimorphos by 33 minutes by mepper
there is more than enough money in the world to spend both on real and unreal problems. the real problem is wealth distribution / inequality… tax the rich!
mistaekNot t1_j9nfn4j wrote
Reply to comment by DFWPunk in Rep. Eastman sparks outrage after asking about the potential economic benefits of the deaths of abused Alaska children by HoboWithAComputer
people voted for this trash. they get what they deserve
mistaekNot t1_j9la99d wrote
Reply to comment by psioniclizard in Dutch intelligence services have warned that Russia is "covertly mapping" key energy infrastructure in the North Sea, in preparation for possible sabotage attacks. by green_flash
it’s not a matter of belief. you can already see this with himars. russia is unable to destroy these launchers, as they outrange russian artillery and russian planes can’t get overhead them either. so himars is invulnerable. the damage ukraine is able to inflict with himars is only limited by himars ammunition and the number of launchers they have, which is both low. nato has hundreds of himars launchers and virtually unlimited ammo. that’s just one weapon system….
mistaekNot t1_j9kvxr5 wrote
Reply to comment by psioniclizard in Dutch intelligence services have warned that Russia is "covertly mapping" key energy infrastructure in the North Sea, in preparation for possible sabotage attacks. by green_flash
casualties would be massive on the russian side. russia wouldn’t be able to inflict casualties on the nato side, simply because it wouldn’t have the means to do so. russian air force is no match for nato air force, russian anti air would be destroyed either by stealthy planes or nato artillery which is more precise and out ranges the russian artillery. russian tanks would be destroyed from air. there wouldn’t even be much troop on troop engagement as russian equipment would just keep blowing up and they wouldn’t even know how or where the rounds or missiles are coming from. this won’t happen because nukes, but don’t kid yourself that there would be any kind of even matchup between nato/russia military
mistaekNot t1_j9ivuo7 wrote
Reply to comment by BlueJinjo in Dutch intelligence services have warned that Russia is "covertly mapping" key energy infrastructure in the North Sea, in preparation for possible sabotage attacks. by green_flash
conventional nato military would absolutely decimate russian forces it would be iraq 2.0 - a true special military operation.
mistaekNot t1_jaj55j4 wrote
Reply to comment by Embite in NASA’s DART data validates kinetic impact as planetary defense method | DART altered the orbit of the asteroid moonlet Dimorphos by 33 minutes by mepper
some of the energy is in the shrapnels speed. if the spacecraft gets buried into the dimorphos then all of its energy is transferred into dimorphos