You have failed to provide the exact context to that summary, and just leaning on name dropping is poor form, Jack.

Aight, well I find your paraphrasing about a discussion on a podcast that hints at an 'air of mystery' coupled with your exaggerated generalities to be sufficiently lacking to continue this.

Adios, muchachos.

I would disagree with your infinitely large broad brush strokes slathered on there. Log files exist for a reason.

>I claim that it is impossible to see what is inside a black hole, and to say that god isn't there is fundamentally an assumption.

Ok.

> I apply this analogy to artificial intelligence, claiming that because not everything is fully understood, there is room for something the engineers missed that makes it sentient.

What AI are you talking about? Every 'AI'? Some hypothetical 'tv-and-movie-AI'?

I see a large number of nebulous claims, and little in the way of starting a discussion. Good luck with that.

What is your discussion point?

Sounds like a wonderful idea to upload all my company documents to some unknown, unsecured, third party that totally won't abuse that information down the road.