mvujas
mvujas OP t1_j0lrh8u wrote
Reply to comment by DoctorFuu in [D] ChatGPT, crowdsourcing and similar examples by mvujas
That's a good one!
mvujas OP t1_j0llkjy wrote
Reply to comment by CriticalTemperature1 in [D] ChatGPT, crowdsourcing and similar examples by mvujas
Oh, just reading the answer again, there is actually a feedback button in the top right corner of each answer, but I would assume that even if a small percentage of users is using this button, it ends up costing less than paying people to do this manually
mvujas OP t1_j0l9aht wrote
Reply to comment by CriticalTemperature1 in [D] ChatGPT, crowdsourcing and similar examples by mvujas
That is true, but it's a similar case with crowdsourcing, they have some clever things there such as honeypots and weighted expertise scores or whatever they are called in order to make the most of the data. But I would even argue that continuing a conversation is a form of positive feedback or even coming back to the website
mvujas OP t1_j0l0l1n wrote
Reply to comment by jasondads1 in [D] ChatGPT, crowdsourcing and similar examples by mvujas
Does dalle2 use human feedback in any form other than labeling false positives? I haven't played much with dalle2 to be honest, but I can definitely see how they could have been collecting data for a future iteration of the model that may use reinforcement learning in some form.
Submitted by mvujas t3_zo5imc in MachineLearning
mvujas OP t1_j0v81dn wrote
Reply to comment by ChuckSeven in [D] ChatGPT, crowdsourcing and similar examples by mvujas
I haven’t thought much of that but after reading everything about it, it seems just like an example I was looking for! Very clever approach!