not_the_fox

not_the_fox t1_iu37gvb wrote

Proposals to add representatives for North American colonies were discussed at various times but were politically very unpopular in Britain. They knew it was causing a division but they didn't want to share political power.

https://books.google.com/books?id=OBvNHl6UYKsC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false

1

not_the_fox t1_iu36amw wrote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_taxation_without_representation

>The phrase had been used for more than a generation in Ireland.[8][9] By 1765, the term was in use in Boston, and local politician James Otis was most famously associated with the phrase, "taxation without representation is tyranny."[10] In the course of the Revolutionary era (1750–1783), many arguments were pursued that sought to resolve the dispute surrounding Parliamentary sovereignty, taxation, self-governance and representation
>
>In the context of British taxation of its American colonies, the slogan"No taxation without representation" appeared for the first time in a headline of a February 1768 London Magazine printing of Lord Camden's "Speech on the Declaratory Bill of the Sovereignty of Great Britain over the Colonies," which was given in parliament.[2] The British government argued for virtual representation, the idea that people were represented by members of Parliament even if they didn't get to vote for them.

2